citedby: 8093487

Harish Kumar vs Inder Mohan Nagpal on 22 September, 2022

10. To support the submission that one co-owner could not, in the absence of consent of other co-owners, file an eviction petition in respect of the property, the petitioner relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Mangal Builders and Enterprises Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Company Ltd.5

Delhi High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Mukesh Sudhir vs Vinish Sood on 30 November, 2023

10. Judgment in Mangal Builders's case (supra), relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not applicable to the facts of present case as in that case co-owner had raised objection to the eviction petition from the beginning of the case itself.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amrit Pal Kaur & Ors vs Harcharan Singh Josh on 14 October, 2024

owner of the same property is to seek for a decree of partition claiming separate/exclusive possession. The suit for partition has not been instituted and, therefore, the suit for possession alone is not maintainable. To support this submission, he has placed reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Budhram v. Bansi and Ors.1, A. Viswanatha Pillai and Ors. v. Special Tahsildar for Land Acquisition2, Rachakonda Venkatrao and Ors. v. R. Satya Bai (dead) by LR. And Anr.3, Delhi Development Authority v. Diwan Chand Anand and Ors.4 and Mangal Builders & Enterprises Limited and Ors. v Williamson Magor & Company Ltd. and Ors.5 .

Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Chander Mohan Chopra vs Nand Kishore (Deceased) on 16 October, 2025

Amarjeet Lal Suri v Moti Sagar Suri, 2005 (119) DLT 295; P. S. batra v S. Anoop Singh, 2008 (155) DLT 431; Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah v Muddasani Sarojana, AIR 2016 SC 2250; Anil Rishi v Gurbaksh Singh, AIR 2006 SC 1971; Harish Mansukhani v Ashok Jain, (2009) 109 DRJ 126; Rahul S. Shah v Jinendra Kumar Gandhi & Ors, (2021) 6 SCC 418; Ramvir Singh v Sangeeta Aggarwal & Ors., 2022 (289) DLT 672; Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd. v Regency Convention Centre and Hotel's Private Ltd., (2010) 7 SCC 417; Rohit Dhankard v Sandhya Gupta & Ors., CM (M) 1356/2019, D.O.D. 28.01.2020; Mangal Builders & Enterprises Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Company Ltd., 2020 (1) RCR (Rent) 116; M/s Karta Ram Rameshwar Dass v Ram Bilas & Ors., AIR 2006 SC 362; Navin Chander Anand v Union Bank of India, 2018 (253) DLT 224; Sh. Ranbir Yadav v Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors., 2018 (253) DLT 611; M/s Narain Jewellers v Col.

Delhi District Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chander Mohan Chopra vs Nand Kishore (Since Deceased) on 16 October, 2025

Amarjeet Lal Suri v Moti Sagar Suri, 2005 (119) DLT 295; P. S. batra v S. Anoop Singh, 2008 (155) DLT 431; Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah v Muddasani Sarojana, AIR 2016 SC 2250; Anil Rishi v Gurbaksh Singh, AIR 2006 SC 1971; Harish Mansukhani v Ashok Jain, (2009) 109 DRJ 126; Rahul S. Shah v Jinendra Kumar Gandhi & Ors, (2021) 6 SCC 418; Ramvir Singh v Sangeeta Aggarwal & Ors., 2022 (289) DLT 672; Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd. v Regency Convention Centre and Hotel's Private Ltd., (2010) 7 SCC 417; Rohit Dhankard v Sandhya Gupta & Ors., CM (M) 1356/2019, D.O.D. 28.01.2020; Mangal Builders & Enterprises Ltd. v. Williamson Magor & Company Ltd., 2020 (1) RCR (Rent) 116; M/s Karta Ram Rameshwar Dass v Ram Bilas & Ors., AIR 2006 SC 362; Navin Chander Anand v Union Bank of India, 2018 (253) DLT 224; Sh. Ranbir Yadav v Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors., 2018 (253) DLT 611; M/s Narain Jewellers v Col.

Delhi District Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajinder Kumar vs . Chaya Devi And Others on 16 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search