Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 203 (3.83 seconds)
Documents citing Subramanian Swamy vs Union Of India, Min. Of Law. on 13 May, 2016

Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ch. Kiron vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ch Kiran vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanaparthi Srinivasa Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Nageshwara Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 October, 2025

In this regard, an earlier decision of this Court in Bairam Muralidhar v. State of A.P. (2014) 10 SCC 380 while dealing with Section 321 CrPC (i.e. withdrawal from prosecution) was considered by this Court and it was held as follows : (Subramanian Swamy case [Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221 : SCC p. 349, para 203) 88 Dr.YLR,J Crl.R.C.No.502/2025 & batch 27.10.2025 "203. ... It is ordinarily expected that the Public Prosecutor has a duty to scan the materials on the basis of which a complaint for defamation is to be filed. He has a duty towards the court.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 77 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next