citedby: 814612

Padmanund Sing vs Anant Lal Misser And Ors. on 23 August, 1906

10. It has already been decided by this Court in the case of Karaman Sing v. Norman Cockell (1897) I.C.W.N. 670, and in the case of Brahmamoyi Dasi v. Andi Si (1889) I.L.R. 27 Calc. 376 that Section 54 may be applied at any stage of a suit and that the fact that a plaint has been registered does not prevent its rejection under that section.

Calcutta High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Kolisetti Basavayya And Ors. vs Mittapalli Venkatappayya And Anr. on 18 February, 1926

To the other effect, namely, that the Court has no discretion to admit payment after the time fixed is a ruling in Brahmomoyi Dasi v. Andi Si (1899) I.L.R. 27 C. 376 under the old Code.

Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Ravindra Kumar Gupta And 3 Ors. vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta And Another on 5 October, 2013

To the other effect, namely, that the Court has no discretion to admit payment after the time fixed is a ruling in Brahmomoyi V. Andi Si (8) under the old code.

Allahabad High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 1 - R R Awasthi - Full Document

Budhan Shah vs Sita Nath Shah on 28 June, 1910

This view was not accepted by the majority of the learned Judges who composed the Full Bench and is also in accord with that taken in the case of Brahmomoyi Dasi v. Andi 27 C. 376 and Hara Kumar Pal Chowdhury v. Safatulla 2 C.L.J. 70 : 9 C.W.N. 844. In our opinion, when a parly asks for an indulgence of this description and invites the Court to make an order under Section 149 or under that section read with Section 148, an application should be made to the Court, and the record ought clearly to indicate that all the circumstances have been brought to the notice of the Court and the Court with full knowledge thereof has in the exercise of its discretion made an order entitling the plaintiff to make up the deficiency within the time fixed under Section 149 or within any additional period allowed under Section 148.

Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Dwarka Nath Biswas vs Kedar Nath Biswas on 1 April, 1909

My attention, however, has been invited to the decision of this Court in Bruhmomoyi Dasi v. Andi Si 27 C. 376 which might at first sight appear to be an authority in support of the contrary view.

Calcutta High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Dewan Amir Hossain Khan And Ors. vs Nanhak Chand on 5 May, 1910

The case of Brahmomoyi Dasi v. Andi Si 27 C. 376 comes nearer and is against the appellant but there also was no application for extension and the Court did not think it was making an extension.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Radha Kanta Saha And Ors. vs Debendra Narayan Saha And Ors. on 15 February, 1922

585 ; Brahmomoyi Dasi v. Andi Si 27 C. 376 : 14 Ind. Dec. (N.S.)

Calcutta High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results