Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.56 seconds)

Union Of India vs Shri Alok Kansal on 31 January, 2020

20. I have duly examined the issues involved in the matter. Taking into consideration the various dates and events, I am of the opinion that conclusion drawn by the arbitrator is based on sound reasons. The purchaser / petitioner was not justified in unilaterally extending the delivery period and cannot be permitted to disown Union of India v. Alok Kansal & Anr. Page No.14 of 16 the letter dated 04.12.2004 (although issued by the consignee) as the copy thereof with request for deferment of supplies (after 01.04.2005 and before 30.04.2005) was sent to the contractor. The consignee communicated through letter dated 04.12.2004 on behalf of purchaser only. The floating of risk purchase tender on 10.12.2004 (even before the expiry of delivery period as extended vide letter dated 04.12.2004) was not justified as the original purchase order was still alive. No notice for cancellation of original purchase order prior to floating risk purchase tender, was given to the contractor. The conclusion drawn by the arbitrator is based on facts of the case and on due appreciation of evidence and documents.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1