Nirmal Singh vs Arwinder Singh on 16 May, 2018
6. On the other hand, appellant Nirmal Singh himself appeared
into the witness box as DW1 and reiterated his stand taken in his written
statement by furnishing his affidavit Ex.DW1/A and also proved documents
Ex. D1 to Ex.D5. Indu Bala, Senior Assistant Accounts, PUDA, while
appearing into the witness box as DW2 deposed that she has brought the
record relating to the allotment of residential plot bearing no.1049/II, Phase
II, Jalandhar. She testified that vide letter no. 6658 dated 31.10.1986, the
plot was allotted in favour of Nirmal Singh, resident of 1760, Sector 23,
Chandigarh. As per the record, all installments and additional price of the
plot have also been deposited by the appellant. She proved copies of the
Demand and Collection Register as Ex. DW2/A. Shri Hardeep Singh, Clerk,
PUDA, Jalandhar, while appearing in the witness box as DW3 deposed that
as per the record, plot no.1049, Urban Estate, Phase-II, Jalandhar was
4 of 21
::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2018 20:45:54 :::
Regular Second Appeal No.3644 of 2011 (O&M) 5
allotted to Nirmal Singh on 31.10.1986. He proved the copy of allotment
letter as Ex.DW3/A, letter dated 1.12.1986 as Ex.DW3/B, whereby he
deposited installments. He further proved applications Ex.DW3/C to
Ex.DW3/E and Ex.DW3/F to Ex.DW3/L vide which the appellant deposited
the installments. Shri Pankaj Malhotra, Clerk, Judicial Record Room,
Jalandhar, stepped into the witness box as DW4 and brought the judicial
file relating to Civil Suit No.587 of 1990 titled as Sant Parkash Singh
versus Nirmal Singh decided by the court of Shri D.R.Arora, the then Civil
Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar. He also brought receipts Ex.DW4/1 to
Ex.DW4/11, issued by PUDA in the name of Nirmal Singh.