Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Sandeep Gupta vs Uoi & Others Through on 23 September, 2015

6. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, invited our attention to the syllabus of B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics prescribed by the University of Delhi, and the certificates issued by the Principal of the college where the applicants studied B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, and submitted that the applicants have studied Mechanics & Strength of materials, Electricity and Magnetism, Thermal Physics, Mathematical Physics I, Mathematical Physics II and have conducted Physics Practical-I in the first year, and have studied Modern Physics and Quantum Mechanics, Modern Optics and Opto-electronics, Mathematical Physics III, and have conducted Physics Practical-II in the second year, and have studied Electromagnetism and Antennas in the third year of the three-year course of B.Sc.(Honours) Electronics. Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the prospectus wherein it has been laid down that B.Sc.( Honours) Electronics is also prescribed as the minimum eligibility requirement for admission to M.Sc. (Physics). Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj also invited our attention to the courses of study for B.Sc. (Honours) Physics, and contended that the applicants have studied most of the course contents B.Sc. (Honours) Physics. It was, therefore, contended by Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj that the applicants, having studied Physics as one of the main subjects in B.Sc. (Honours) Electronics, could not have been held as not possessing Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics as one of the main subjects. To buttress his contentions, Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj placed reliance on the decisions of the Honble High Court of Delhi in Ms.Nisha, etc. v. Union of India and others, etc., W.P.( C ) No. 6100 of 2012 & connected writ petitions, decided on 26.11.2012; Khushbu Sharma v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.2916 of 2013, decided on 23.5.2013; and Ravinder Chauhan v. UOI & others, W.P. ( C ) No.3663 of 2011, decided on 23.7.2014.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandeep Gupta vs M/O Personnel,Public Grievances And ... on 23 September, 2015

recruitment to the posts. As regards the observations in Ravinder Chauhan's case (supra), to which our attention was invited by Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, we have found that the rejection of the candidatures of the applicants was not based on any opinion expressed by any expert body. The applicants' candidatures were rejected by SSC when it found that the applicants did not fulfill the minimum essential educational qualification prescribed for the post. Therefore, the above decisions cited by Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, learned counsel, are of no help to the case of the applicants.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1