Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.41 seconds)

Subed Khan And 2 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic ... on 3 July, 2018

Manju Awasthi and others v. State of U.P. and others, decided on 6.11.2012'; and further upon the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Ajay Pratap Rai v. District Basic Education Officer, Jaunpur and others reported in 2007 (3) UPLBEC 106; and upon the judgment passed in Special Appeal No.306 of 2016 titled 'Abdullah v. State of U.P. and 5 others' decided on 3.8.2016.
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - I Ali - Full Document

Anurag Mishra @ Kapil vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 June, 2021

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Pushpendra vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 April, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Shani Paswan (Minor) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 May, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Juvenile X vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 May, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Ritik vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 May, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Anil Kumar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 May, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

X(M) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 June, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Nurul Haq (Minor) Thru. His Sister ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 13 September, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document

Arjun Gupta Thru. Father Ganga Ram Gupta vs State Of U.P. on 15 September, 2022

Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S K Yadav - Full Document
1   2 Next