Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 616 (5.04 seconds)
Documents citing Surinder Kumar vs Union Territory, Chandigarh on 8 March, 1989

Daleshwar Gope Son Of Sri Ishwar Gope vs The State Of Bihar on 5 March, 2024

92. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Nankaunoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been Cr. Appeal (DB) No.141 of 1996(R) with
Jharkhand High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Daleshwar Gope Son Of Sri Ishwar Gope vs The State Of Bihar on 5 March, 2024

92. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Nankaunoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been Cr. Appeal (DB) No.141 of 1996(R) with
Jharkhand High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Chunda Murmu vs The State Of Jharkhand on 12 February, 2024

67. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Nankaunoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and other aforesaid judicial pronouncement wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rebutting back to the facts of the given case, is proceeding to examine the fact of the given case.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Joseph Soy Son Of Late Nathaniel Soy vs The State Of Jharkhand on 5 March, 2024

63. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Nankaunoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Supra), MurlidharShivramPatekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not
Jharkhand High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Hasimuddin Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2025

75. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rayavarapu Punnayya and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rebutting back to the facts of the given case, is proceeding to examine the fact of the given case.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Hasimuddin Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2025

75. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rayavarapu Punnayya and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rebutting back to the facts of the given case, is proceeding to examine the fact of the given case.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Hasimuddin Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2025

75. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rayavarapu Punnayya and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rebutting back to the facts of the given case, is proceeding to examine the fact of the given case.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Hasimuddin Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2025

75. This Court, on the basis of the factual aspect as discussed hereinabove as also after taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory, Chandigarh (Supra), Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra (Supra) and Surain Singh v. State of Punjab (Supra) and Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rayavarapu Punnayya and other aforesaid judicial pronouncements wherein the difference has been carved out in between the culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rebutting back to the facts of the given case, is proceeding to examine the fact of the given case.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Vikrambhai @ Bhako Keshubhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 3 October, 2017

In  Surinder   Kumar   v.   Union   Territory,   Chandigarh     (supra),   the   Supreme   Court   has  elaborated upon the requirements of Exception­4  to  Section  300. These are  accepted  principles  of   law   which   may   come   in   useful   to   the  applicants at the stage of the final hearing of  the appeal. They would have no bearing at this  stage.
Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - A Kumari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next