Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Acharya Gyan Ayurved College vs Department Of Ayush & Ors. on 30 November, 2010

K. N. H. Homoeopathic Medical College ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Dr. Ajay Kumar Sharma vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - C S Singh - Full Document

B. N. M. Homeopathic Medical College And ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 8 - C S Singh - Full Document

The Temple Of Hahnemann Homeopathic ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 24 - C S Singh - Full Document

Maharshi Menhi Homeopathic College & ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 8 - C S Singh - Full Document

Mangla Kamla Homeopathy College & ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017

59. The decision of Delhi High Court in case of Acharya Gyan Ayurved College (supra), can have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications. The Delhi High Court in the said case did not have occasion to deal with 2013 Regulations on the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission. From the said decision, I find that the Delhi High Court had the occasion to deal with the effect of recommendation and in that background, following settled law that the Central Government is not bound by the recommendation held that the recommendations are not binding. This is not a question involved in these cases as to whether the Central Government was bound by the recommendation of the CCH. The question involved is as to whether the Central Government had any authority either to consider the question of grant of permission for undertaking admission under Regulation 3 (4) of the Regulations. In my view, therefore, Delhi High Court's decision shall have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present batch of writ applications.
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 8 - C S Singh - Full Document

Dhanwantri Ayurvedic Medical College ... vs Uoi And Anr on 12 December, 2011

8. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the order that may be passed by the respondents, it shall be entitled to seek its remedies in law. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that if the order passed by the respondent No.1/UOI is favourable to the petitioner/Institution, then it should be permitted to induct students for the BAMS (UG) Course for the Academic Year 2011-12. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/UOI opposes such a plea and while stating that no such indulgence can be granted to the petitioner, he relies on an order dated 20.12.2011 passed in LPA No.899/2010 entitled 'Acharya Gyan Ayurved College vs. Department of Ayush & Ors.', to submit that in similar circumstances, having regard to the directions of the Supreme Court that the cut-off date for admission of students is 30th October, 2011, which was extended to 30th November, 2011 for the year in question in exceptional circumstances, no such permission as sought, was granted to the appellant therein. It is clarified that the petitioner shall await the order to be passed by respondent No.1/UOI and in the event the petitioner initiates proceedings to challenge such a decision or to seek consequential relief, then its claim to induct students for the BAMS (UG) W.P.(C) No.8351/2011 Page 5 of 6 Course for the academic year 2011-12, shall be a subject matter of consideration in the said proceedings.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Kohli - Full Document

Union Of India vs Dhanwantri Ayurvedic Medical College & ... on 9 November, 2012

13. Though the counsel for the respondent no.3 CCIM has propounded the policy, of a Medical College being required to have only that much of LPA No.719/2012 Page 8 of 9 faculty members as are for the time being required, but such policy even if can be said to be in existence, is not binding on the appellant. It has been held by one of us (R.S. Endlaw, J) in Acharya Gyan Ayurved College Vs. Department of Ayush MANU/DE/3346/2010 that the recommendations of the CCIM are not binding on the appellant. The appellant clearly has rejected the claim of the respondent no.1 College on the basis of the said purported policy. No error is found in the said decision of the appellant, especially considering the track record of the respondent no.1 College. Once the decision of the appellant is found to be based on reasons, the same cannot be interfered with by this Court merely because this Court may have formed another opinion.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1