Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Mira Banik And Anr. vs Smita Bhattacharyya And Ors. on 11 August, 2003

Toghral Kamal vs Kiran Shankar Paul & Anr on 8 August, 2014

Mira Banik & Anr. (supra) speaks power of a Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It lays down that, "Article 227 is an essential weapon, provided to the High Court through wisdom of the founding fathers of the Constitution, to be used whenever it is needed according to the need of the hour. It can be used and utilized to defend as a shield or offend as a sword. If situation warrants, in order to keep Court within its bounds, in order to prevent abuse of process, in order to preserve sanctity, restore the dignity, maintain the faith and inspire confidence of people in it, the High Court may even quash the plaint or the proceeding in appropriate case."
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - D Basak - Full Document

Capt. G.Senthilkumar vs M.Durairaj on 9 August, 2023

4. Lastly, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the court below failed to consider all the documents and various orders passed by this Court and the Hon'ble Apex Court in respect of the suit property placed before it. In support of his contention, he has relied on the order passed in this Court in C.R.P No.2954 of 2021 dated 28.04.2023 [D.Harish and ors. Vs. Champalatha and Ors.] and the Judgment of High Court of Calcutta in F.M.A.T.No.1774 of 2003 dated 11.08.2003 [Mira Bank and Others Vs. Smita Bhattacharyya and Others] .
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V B Subbaroyan - Full Document

Gautam Sen & Ors vs Dr. Ganesh Dasgupta on 3 July, 2018

Drawing attention of this Court, in Mira Banik (supra) Mr. Ghosal submitted that a Court in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, cannot confine itself only to the jurisdictional error but can even delve deep into the facts in detail and to find out whether the learned Court below has correctly passed the order impugned based on the facts pleaded by the parties. There is no doubt about the proposition advanced by Mr. Ghosal that a Court, under Article 227 of the Constitution, has the power to find out illegalities, if committed.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Munshi - Full Document

P.Dineshchand vs Ellamma on 14 November, 2025

16.The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Calcatta High Court in Mira Banik and another Vs. Smita Bhattacharya and others, reported in 2005 Calcutta Weekly Notes 698, held that the power of superintendence of the High Court includes the power to see whether the Courts and Tribunals do what their duty requires and that they do it in a legal manner and that under Article 227, the High Court can even exercise suo motu power.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1