Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 308 (4.81 seconds)
Documents citing Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd vs Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors on 7 March, 2006

Ahmadbhai Karimbhai Sheikh vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:00:58 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Ahmadbhai Karimbhai Sheikh And Others vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:01:08 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare, Director, ... vs Shri Sunil Porwal, Additional Chief ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:01:15 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 10 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Shri Ashok S/O Bapuraoji Davare And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:00:50 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Brackish Water Research Centre vs State Of Gujarat on 3 August, 2018

In support of the above, Shri Joshi, learned Counsel appearing on  behalf of respondent No.8 has heavily relied upon the decision of the  Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of  Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd.   v. Bombay Environmental Action Group And Others - (2006)3 SCC   434 (Paragraphs 341 to 349) and State of M.P. And Others v. Nandlal   Jaiswal And Others - (1986)4 SCC 566 (Paragraphs 24 and 25).
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Gulabrao Kode And Others vs Principal Secretary, Dept. Of ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:00:44 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Hemraj Marotrao Shingne And Others vs Principal Secretary, Department Of ... on 16 January, 2018

In this respect Shri Raghute, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the farmers has rightly invited our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (3) vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors., (supra). There, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 312 has observed that an order of Court needs to be construed having regard to the text and context in which the same was passed. The judgment cannot be read as a statute and it needs to be understood in the light of factual matrix involved therein. This precedent reveals that any observation made in the ::: Uploaded on - 17/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2018 02:00:37 ::: wp4488.17 81 judgment cannot be read in isolation and in a different context. Thus, we find that our directions issued on 09.03.2017 in Writ Petition No. 585 of 2017 also need to be construed keeping in mind the facts and law then prevailing.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 1 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Janhit Manch vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 September, 2009

11. Mr. R.A. Dada has also drawn our attention to a Judgment of the Supreme Court and submits that the controversies raised in this case are already covered by the Judgment of the Supreme Court wherein a public interest litigation against the same industry was decided by the Supreme Court. The said ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:06:32 ::: 33 Judgment is reported in (2006) 3 SCC 434 {Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Bombay Environmental Action Group and others}. An environmental group had filed a petition questioning the validity of DCR 58 framed by the State of Maharashtra in terms of the MRTP Act, 1966. Various textile factories including respondent No.3 herein were the respondents in the said case. The learned senior counsel has drawn our attention to the observations in para 107 which read that, "The parameters of judicial review in relation to a policy decision would depend upon the nature as also the scope and object of the legislation. No hard-and-fast rule can be laid down therefor. The court normally would not, however, interfere with a policy decision which has been made by experts in view of the fact that it does not possess such expertise."
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - B Nazki - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next