Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 84 (1.56 seconds)

Chint Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 15 May, 2015

At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant raised an alternate OMKAR SINGH 2015.05.20 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRA-S No.560-SB of 1996 [14] plea that at best the appellant can be held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC and sentence imposed upon him be reduced to that of already undergone. He relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurnaib Singh v. State of Punjab, 2013 (7) SCC 108 and a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Krishan Kumar and others v. State of Haryana, 2006(3) RCR (Crl.) 7.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Naresh Kumar & Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 October, 2017

It has also been rightly pointed out by the counsel for the State that similar writ petitions were also filed at a belated stage in the year 2002, bearing CWP-22455-2012 titled Rajesh Vs. State of Haryana & others and CWP-25957-2012 titled Krishan Kumar & others Vs. State of Haryana & others, which were dismissed on 04.11.2004 (Annexure R-9) and 16.01.2015 (Annexure R-10), respectively (attached with the file of CWP-17598-2015).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Sanjeev Bagga S/O Tilak Raj And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 19 December, 2015

The issue of delay has been raised on behalf of the State of Haryana to deny relief to the petitioners. Counsel for the State has submitted that the cause of action in the case of the petitioners arose in the year 1996, whereas the petitioners made their first representation only in the year 2008. To buttress her submission, reliance is placed upon a judgment of this Court in Krishan Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and others - C. W. P. No. 9813 of 2012, decided on 21.11.2014.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - D Sibal - Full Document

Mangal Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 March, 2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Primary Teachers/Junior Basic Training teachers (JBTs) in the pay scale of 4500-7000 prior to 01.01.2006; that, vide notification dated 30.12.2008 issued by the Government of Haryana, the said pay scale was revised in the pay band of 9300-34800 + 4200 (GP), which was made applicable w.e.f. 01.01.2006; that as per the said Notification, the initial pay of the petitioners was supposed to be fixed @ Rs.16,290/- (Rs.12,090/- + Rs.4,200/-); that, thereafter, the Government of Haryana again issued a Notification dated 16.12.2010 improving further the structure of Entry Level Pay for the post-01.01.2006 direct 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 09-06-2023 20:50:59 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:045348 237-Y CWP-3898-2021 (O&M) -2- recruits cadres/services of the State; that the notification dated 16.12.2010 was challenged by some of the JBT teachers by way of CWP- 15320-2018 titled as Krishan Kumar and others vs State of Haryana and others and that since during the pendency of CWP-15320-2018, the Rules were amended on 07.02.2019, the said writ petition was dismissed on 22.05.2019, as having become infructuous. He further submits that though the pay scale of the petitioners were fixed, keeping in view the Notification issued by the Government of Haryana, yet the respondent- Department has issued the impugned notices, which have been stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.02.2021.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H S Gill - Full Document

Shanti Josi And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 March, 2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Primary Teachers/Junior Basic Training teachers (JBTs) in the pay scale of 4500-7000 prior to 01.01.2006; that, vide notification dated 30.12.2008 issued by the Government of Haryana, the said pay scale was revised in the pay band of 9300-34800 + 4200 (GP), which was made applicable w.e.f. 01.01.2006; that as per the said Notification, the initial pay of the petitioners was supposed to be fixed @ Rs.16,290/- (Rs.12,090/- + Rs.4,200/-); that, thereafter, the Government of Haryana again issued a Notification dated 16.12.2010 improving further the structure of Entry Level Pay for the post-01.01.2006 direct 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 09-06-2023 20:50:21 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:045343 237-O CWP-38250-2018 (O&M) -2- recruits cadres/services of the State; that the notification dated 16.12.2010 was challenged by some of the JBT teachers by way of CWP- 15320-2018 titled as Krishan Kumar and others vs State of Haryana and others and that since during the pendency of CWP-15320-2018, the Rules were amended on 07.02.2019, the said writ petition was dismissed on 22.05.2019, as having become infructuous. He further submits that though the pay scale of the petitioners were fixed, keeping in view the Notification issued by the Government of Haryana, yet the respondent- Department has issued the impugned notices, which have been stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 24.12.2018.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H S Gill - Full Document

Vijender Kumar And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 21 March, 2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Primary Teachers/Junior Basic Training teachers (JBTs) in the pay scale of 4500-7000 prior to 01.01.2006; that, vide notification dated 30.12.2008 issued by the Government of Haryana, the said pay scale was revised in the pay band of 9300-34800 + 4200 (GP), which was made applicable w.e.f. 01.01.2006; that as per the said Notification, the initial pay of the petitioners was supposed to be fixed @ Rs.16,290/- (Rs.12,090/- + Rs.4,200/-); that, thereafter, the Government of Haryana again issued a Notification dated 16.12.2010 improving further the structure of Entry Level Pay for the post-01.01.2006 direct 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 09-06-2023 20:49:42 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:045334 237-AA CWP-601-2021 (O&M) -2- recruits cadres/services of the State; that the notification dated 16.12.2010 was challenged by some of the JBT teachers by way of CWP- 15320-2018 titled as Krishan Kumar and others vs State of Haryana and others and that since during the pendency of CWP-15320-2018, the Rules were amended on 07.02.2019, the said writ petition was dismissed on 22.05.2019, as having become infructuous. He further submits that though the pay scale of the petitioners were fixed, keeping in view the Notification issued by the Government of Haryana, yet the respondent- Department has issued the impugned notices, which have been stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 12.01.2021.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H S Gill - Full Document

Pratap Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 21 March, 2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Primary Teachers/Junior Basic Training teachers (JBTs) in the pay scale of 4500-7000 prior to 01.01.2006; that, vide notification dated 30.12.2008 issued by the Government of Haryana, the said pay scale was revised in the pay band of 9300-34800 + 4200 (GP), which was made applicable w.e.f. 01.01.2006; that as per the said Notification, the initial pay of the petitioners was supposed to be fixed @ Rs.16,290/- (Rs.12,090/- + Rs.4,200/-); that, thereafter, the Government of Haryana again issued a Notification dated 16.12.2010 improving further the structure of Entry Level Pay for the post-01.01.2006 direct 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 09-06-2023 21:07:26 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:045347 237-T CWP-988-2021 (O&M) -2- recruits cadres/services of the State; that the notification dated 16.12.2010 was challenged by some of the JBT teachers by way of CWP- 15320-2018 titled as Krishan Kumar and others vs State of Haryana and others and that since during the pendency of CWP-15320-2018, the Rules were amended on 07.02.2019, the said writ petition was dismissed on 22.05.2019, as having become infructuous. He further submits that though the pay scale of the petitioners were fixed, keeping in view the Notification issued by the Government of Haryana, yet the respondent- Department has issued the impugned notices, which have been stayed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 15.01.2021.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H S Gill - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next