Neelam Sunil Sawlani D/O Narain P Ahuja vs Sunil Murlidhar Sawlani on 22 April, 2022
6. Per contra, Learned advocate Mr. Vijay Patel for the
respondent has urged that in the present case, it is not true that the
respondent - husband is residing at Bombay but sometime he visits
Bombay. He placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the
case of Vaibhavi Pinkesh Solanki Vs. Pinkesh Vijaykumar Solanki
reported in 2021 (3) GLR 2199, wherein, it is observed that the
transfer application filed by the applicant - wife is dismissed by
imposing to and fro travel expenditure to attend the court
proceedings upon the respondent - husband and therefore, this
application may be dismissed on the same line.