Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.02 seconds)
Documents citing Ramjibhai Lalbhai Patel vs Shantaben on 25 April, 1984

Hasumati vs Vinodkumar on 5 September, 2008

(b) of the Bombay Court Fees Act. The petition is not valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and, therefore, the decision rendered in Ramjibhai Lalbhai Patel Vs. Smt. Shantaben D/o Manilal Jashkanbhai Patel, 1984 GLH 986 can be very well referred to, where the principle adopted is that the petition under Hindu Marriage Act was not valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and where the petition for divorce was decided by Extra Assistant Judge, and it was held that the appeal therefrom would not lie to the High Court but, to the District Judge in light of the provisions contained in Bombay Civil Courts Act (Old).
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Shardaben vs Dashrathbhai on 22 September, 2008

(b) of the Bombay Court Fees Act. The petition is not valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and, therefore, the decision rendered in Ramjibhai Lalbhai Patel Vs. Smt. Shantaben D/o Manilal Jashkanbhai Patel, 1984 GLH 986 can be very well referred to, where the principle adopted is that the petition under Hindu Marriage Act was not valued for the purpose of jurisdiction and where the petition for divorce was decided by Extra Assistant Judge, and it was held that the appeal therefrom would not lie to the High Court but, to the District Judge in light of the provisions contained in Bombay Civil Courts Act (Old).
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document
1