Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

State vs . on 23 October, 2018

68.   Therefore, in view of the evidence discussed above and the judgments referred above, I am of the considered opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond doubt against the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 498­A IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 13 September, 2019

64. So far as the testimonies of PW­1 Sunehari Lal Sharma (Father of the deceased), PW­2 Smt. Munni Devi (Mother of the deceased), PW­6 Bablu Sharma (Brother of the complainant) and PW­8 Dinesh Kumar (Neighbourer of the complainant) are concerned, it is not covered under the 'torture' and cannot be equated with 'torture'. Reliance in this regard can be placed upon the judgment of Mintu Mia Vs. State reported as 2013 SCC Online Cal. 9714.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1