Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.36 seconds)

Popatbhai Dhanjibhai Patel,, ... vs The Ito, Ward-1(2)(5),, Ahmedabad on 24 February, 2023

15. We are not in agreement with the Ld.CIT(A) on the issue. It is not denied that the assessee had made complete investment of Rs. 21 lacs for purchase of property well within the stipulated time. It is only that the construction was completed later on and sale deed entered into on completion of construction. Courts have held the conditions for claiming exemption u/s 54F of the Act to be fulfilled in such circumstances. The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs Smt. Shantha Kumari (2015) 233 taxmann.com 347(Kar) has held that if after making complete payment merely because a registered sale deed has not been executed be it because construction was not completed in all respects, that would not disentitle the assessee from claiming the benefit u/s 54F of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1