Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Neeraj Kumar Shukla vs State Of U.T on 5 October, 2010

Jasvir Singh @ Tilu vs State Of Punjab on 17 August, 2023

7. As per the custody cer ficate, the pe oner's total custody is 3years and 2 months. Although the pe oner has criminal antecedents but indisputably has spent more than three years in pre-trial custody in this FIR. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023, not because his custody is of two years and six months but because his custody is more than three years and considering the quan ty involved in the earlier case and nature of offence in second case, the criminal history should not come as a hindrance.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Mohd.Latif vs State Of Punjab on 17 August, 2023

7. As per the custody cer ficate, the pe oner's total custody is 3 years, 2 months and 2 days. Although the pe oner has criminal antecedents but indisputably has spent more than three years in pre-trial custody in this FIR. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023, not because his custody is of two years and six months but because his custody is more than three years and considering the nature of offence in earlier case, the criminal history should not come as a hindrance.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Supinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 August, 2023

7. As per paragraph 11 of the pe oner, the pe oner is in custody since 29.07.2020. Although the pe oner has criminal antecedents but indisputably has spent more than three years in pre-trial custody in this FIR. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023, not because his custody is of two years and six months but because his custody is more than three years and considering the quan ty involved in the earlier case and nature of offence in second case, the criminal history should not come as a hindrance.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Upashu Garg Alias Upanshu Garg vs State Of Punjab And Another on 11 May, 2023

5. As per the pe oner and also as per the custody cer ficate, the pe oner's total custody exceeds two years and six months. The pe oner indisputably has no criminal antecedents and has already complete pre-trial custody exceeding two years and six months. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023. Dheeraj Shukla would be a racted only when the three condi ons are fulfilled,
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Bittu Singh vs State Of Punjab on 17 July, 2023

6. As per the custody cer ficate, the pe oner's total custody is 2 years, 11 months and 05 days. The pe oner indisputably has no criminal antecedents and has already complete pre-trial custody exceeding two years and six months. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023. Dheeraj Shukla would be a racted only when the three condi ons are fulfilled,
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Mohd. Aws Alhendi @ Alhendi Aws @ Aws Raad ... vs State Of Haryana on 27 July, 2023

6. As per the custody cer ficate, the pe oner's total custody is 02 years, 11 months and 17 days. The pe oner indisputably has no criminal antecedents and has already complete pre-trial custody exceeding two years and six months. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023. Dheeraj Shukla would be a racted only when the three condi ons are fulfilled,
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document

Vicky Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 3 August, 2023

6. As per paragraph 10 of the pe on, the pe oner is in custody since 18.01.2021. The pe oner indisputably has no criminal antecedents and has already complete pre- trial custody exceeding two years and six months. Thus, he is en tled to bail based on Dheeraj Kumar Shukla v. The State of U ar Pradesh [SLP (Crl) 6690-2022], decided on 25 Jan 2023. Dheeraj Shukla would be a racted only when the three condi ons are fulfilled,
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Chitkara - Full Document
1   2 Next