Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Mamatha . on 9 January, 2015

Hari Lal & Anr. vs . Kapil Dev & Anr. on 13 April, 2017

Though   counsel   for   petitioners   has   filed above­said case laws, but Hon'ble Supreme Court of India decided appeal 'The New   India   Assurance   Co.   Ltd.   Vs.   Mamatha   &   Ors.'   (CA   No.   3778/15 decided   on   27.07.2016)   in   favour   of   insurer   on   the   aspect   of   deduction   of Group   Personal   Accident   Claim   Policy   from   compensation   amount.   In   my view,   argument   of   counsel   for   Insurance   Company   that   amount   already received by legal heirs of deceased under Group Personal Accident Insurance is MACT No. 3931/16  Hari Lal & Anr. Vs. Kapil Dev & Anr.  Page No. 13/ 19 liable   to   be   adjusted   in   the   award   amount   is   genuine.   On   13.04.2017, petitioners filed their reply to the application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC of Insurance Company wherein they have duly admitted that they have received a sum of Rs.3,62,000/­ from M/s Birla Sunlife Insurance Company on account of personal accident insurance claim. Thus, petitioners are awarded a total amount of   (Rs.5,34,022/­   minus   Rs.3,62,000/­)  Rs.1,72,022/­   (Rupees   One   Lac Seventy Two Thousand & Twenty Two Only)  which is to be apportioned equally between the petitioners.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Aarti Pathania (Wife Of Deceased), Fir ... vs Jagmohan on 31 October, 2023

16. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the insurance company has stated that the owner was not holding a valid and effective permit for plying his vehicle in Delhi on the date of accident. She also stated that an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- should be deducted as the petitioners have received this amount through group insurance. She has relied upon judgment in The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mamatha and others, Civil Appeal No. 3778 of 2015. She further contended that insurance company is not liable to pay any compensation.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1