Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. M.S. Rajeshwari vs The Joint Commissioner on 2 September, 2022

Smt Megar Sulochana W/O. Megar Nagaraj vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyamanahalli on 21 February, 2023

8. In this context, it is relevant to a perusal of Section 111 to 113 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 will clearly indicate that upon request being made by a holder of the registered Sale Deed to transfer the khatha into his name by issuing a notice in this regard, it is incumbent upon the respondent No.1 and to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee respondent No.1 to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee under the registered deed of transfer / sale and issue Khatha Certificate in Form No.3 in favour of the said purchaser / transferee. The said principles which is also contained in Section 114 (3) of the KMC Act has been relied upon by this Court in its order in Rajeshwari's case supra, which is squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case also.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

Shri M D Basappa S/O.Durgappa vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyamanahalli on 21 February, 2023

8. In this context, it is relevant to a perusal of Section 111 to 113 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 will clearly indicate that upon request being made by a holder of the registered Sale Deed to transfer the khatha into his name by issuing a notice in this regard, it is incumbent upon the respondent No.1 and to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee respondent No.1 to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee under the registered deed of transfer / sale and issue Khatha Certificate in Form No.3 in favour of the said purchaser / transferee. The said principles which is also contained in Section 114 (3) of the KMC Act has been relied upon by this Court in its order in Rajeshwari's case supra, which is squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case also.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

Shri M Kalidas S/O.Late ... vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyamanahalli on 21 February, 2023

8. In this context, it is relevant to a perusal of Section 111 to 113 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 will clearly indicate that upon request being made by a holder of the registered Sale Deed to transfer the khatha into his name by issuing a notice in this regard, it is incumbent upon the respondent No.1 and to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee respondent No.1 to register the khatha in the name of the purchaser / transferee under the registered deed of transfer / sale and issue Khatha Certificate in Form No.3 in favour of the said purchaser / transferee. The said principles which is also contained in Section 114 (3) of the KMC Act has been relied upon by this Court in its order in Rajeshwari's case supra, which is squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case also.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S R Kumar - Full Document

Smt Annapurnamma W/O V.Mahadevaiah vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyamanahalli on 25 July, 2024

In a similar matter a co-ordinate bench of this Court in Smt.M.S.Rajeshwari and others vs. The Joint Commissioner and another in W.P.No.8494/2016, disposed of on 02.09.2022, while dealing with the provisions of section 114 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, which is similar and para-materia to that of section 114 of -5- NC: 2024:KHC-D:10531 WP No. 103526 of 2024 this Municipalities Act, 1964, allowed the petition in favour of the petitioner and directed respondent No.1 to register the khata and issue khata extract in favour of the petitioner.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P S Yerur - Full Document

Abeesh Kumar vs The District Collector on 18 December, 2024

5.In support of his contention, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied upon the Judgment of this Court passed in W.P.No.16586 of 2014 etc.., dated 18.12.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/10 W.P(MD)No.28785 of 2024 [S.Rajeswari Vs. The Joint Commissioner], in which this Court held that the land Temple lands vest in the idol, the idol of being of minor status in law, the Court is the guardian. It is the duty of the Courts to protect and safeguard the properties of Religious and Charitable Institutions.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G K Ilanthiraiyan - Full Document

Smt. Neela Bai J P W/O Rekhya Naik vs The Town Panchayath on 5 November, 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance on the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Smt. Megar Sulochana vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyammanahalli & Another1, wherein, this Court in terms of the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by this Court in Smt. M.S. Rajeshwari and others v. The Joint Commissioner and another2, has held that the Khata is to be changed pursuant to the registered sale deed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. M Ratnamma W/O Sajya Naik vs The Town Panchayath Mariyamanahalli on 5 November, 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance on the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Smt. Megar Sulochana vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyammanahalli & Another1, wherein, this Court in terms of the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by this Court in Smt. M.S. Rajeshwari and others v. The Joint Commissioner and another2, has held that the Khata is to be changed pursuant to the registered sale deed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri. R Bharatkumar S/O Raghunathmal ... vs The Town Panchayath Mariyamanahalli on 5 November, 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance on the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Smt. Megar Sulochana vs The Town Panchayath, Mariyammanahalli & Another1, wherein, this Court in terms of the order dated 02.09.2022 passed by this Court in Smt. M.S. Rajeshwari and others v. The Joint Commissioner and another2, has held that the Khata is to be changed pursuant to the registered sale deed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1