Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (1.44 seconds)

Shailendra Soni vs High Court Of Chhattisgarh on 16 July, 2025

In the present case no such reason has been assigned, therefore, the impugned order so far as extension of probation period is against the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab vs. Dharam Singh and in case of Dayaram Dayal vs. State of M.P. & Others reported in 1997 (7) SCC 440. It has also been contended that due to non-communication of Adverse ACR, it has lost significance and his case should have been considered by the respondents.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - N K Vyas - Full Document

Dayaram vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 7 July, 2020

This writ petition under Article 227 has been filed challenging summoning order dated 27.05.2019, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalitpur in Complaint Case No. 79 of 2019 (Dayaram Vs. Smt. Bharti) under Section 406 I.P.C., P.S.-Bar , District-Lalitpur as well as order dated 12.11.2019 passed by Sessions Judge, Lalitpur in Criminal Revision No. 81 of 2019 (Dayaram Vs. Smt. State of U.P. and ors.) whereby aforesaid criminal revision challenging summoning order has been dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document
1   2 Next