citedby: 85863583

Kamlesh Jivanlal Dave vs State Of Gujarat on 9 May, 2024

320. Reference has further been made to the decision in Brend v. Wood91 and Judgment in Religare Finvest Ltd. vs. State of NCT of Delhi92 to submit that the penal provision must be strictly construed and no vicarious liability in criminal law can be perceived unless the statute takes that also within its fold.

Gujarat High Court Cites 309 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

United Spirits Limited vs Neel Rajesh Shah on 16 July, 2024

In this regard, he relies upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of RELIGARE Finvest Limited vs. State of NCT of Delhi and another2 more particularly Paras 23 and 30, which are reproduced hereunder for easy reference:

Karnataka High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - S Govindaraj - Full Document

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs M/S Aes Chhattisgarh Energy Pvt Ltd on 19 December, 2023

102. Reliance is also placed on State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Chetan Jeff, 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 483, K. Sitaram and another versus CFL Capital Finance Service Ltd and another, criminal appeal No. 2285 of 2011, decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on March 21, 2017, Kanumukkala Krishnamurty vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1965 Supreme Court 333, Abhayanand Mishra vs. The State of Bihar, AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1968, Religare Finvest Limited vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr., 2023 SCC Online SC 1148, Technip SA vs. SMS Holding (P) Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 465, State of U.P. vs. Renusagar Power Co., (1998) 4 SCC 59 and Sunil Bharti Mittal vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Crl. Appeal No. CBI vs M/s AES Chhattisgarh Energy Private Ltd. & Another Judgment dated 19.12.2023 Page 34 of 111 34 of 2015 (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2961 of 2013.

Delhi District Court Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun Ramchandran Pillai vs Directorate Od Enforcement on 11 September, 2024

62. Reliance has also been placed on the decisions in Tarun Kumar vs. Enforcement Directorate, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1486, Satyender Kumar Jain vs. Directorate of Enforcement decided vide SLP (Crl) 6561/2023, State of Bihar & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar, (2017) 13 SCC 751 and Religare Finvest Ltd. vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr., decided vide CRL.M.C. 796/2021 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 14.06.2021.

Delhi High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Amit Arora vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 17 September, 2024

Additionally, it is contended that in Serious economic offences delay cannot be the only ground to grant bail, reliance is placed on judgement of the Apex court in State of Bihar & Anr. v. Amit Kumar (2017) 13 SCC 751 and judgement of Coordinate Bench of this Hon‟ble Court in Religare Finvest Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr,

Delhi High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Amandeep Singh Dhall vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 17 September, 2024

62. Reliance has also been placed on the decisions in Tarun Kumar vs. Enforcement Directorate, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1486, Satyender Kumar Jain vs. Directorate of Enforcement decided vide SLP (Crl) 6561/2023, State of Bihar & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar, (2017) 13 SCC 751 and Religare Finvest Ltd. vs. State of NCT of Delhi &Anr., decided vide CRL.M.C. 796/2021 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 14.06.2021.

Delhi High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Chanpreet Singh Rayat vs Enforcement Directorate on 9 September, 2024

In the end learned counsel has placed reliance on Religare Finvest Ltd vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr, Crl.M.C.796/2021 and State of Bihar and Another vs. Amit Kumar alias Bachcha Rai, (2017) 13 SCC 751 to argue that the plea of delay in trial, is not relevant for the purpose of considering the bail especially in economic offences.

Delhi High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Arun Muthu vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 20 February, 2025

Religare Finvest Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi)42 xxii.

Delhi High Court Cites 87 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra vs The Directorate Of Enforcement on 21 March, 2025

H. It is also submitted that the seriousness of an offence is a valid ground for rejecting bail, even if the trial is expected to take a considerable amount of time to conclude. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of this Hon‟ble Court in Religare Finvest Ltd. vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr., 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3258.

Delhi High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

T.V. Today Network Limited, Through Mr. ... vs The State Of Bihar Through The Law ... on 24 March, 2025

63. It would be apposite to reproduce paragraph-63 of the legal report of Hon'ble Supreme Court as available through Religare Finvest Ltd. case (supra), which is as under:

Patna High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - C S Jha - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results