Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Ramesh Jha And Ors. vs The State on 25 February, 1958

State vs Ranbir Singh Kharb And Others on 13 December, 2023

In Ramesh v State [AIR 1960 SC 154: 1960 Cr LJ 177], the Supreme Court has held that the section 503 IPC consists of two parts, the first part referring to the act of threatening another with injury to his person, reputation or property or to the person or reputation of anyone in which that person is interested, and the second part referring to the intent with which the threatening is carried out and it is also of two categories, one to cause alarm to the person threatened and the second to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the execution of threat.
Delhi District Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sonwati vs Naresh Kumar on 15 October, 2016

If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc. - And if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or (imprisonment for life), or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute, unchastity to a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.  Further,   in   case   of  Ramesh   v   State,   AIR   1960   SC   154, following ingredients are necessary for the offence under Section 506 of IPC :­ I)   The   accused   threatened   someone   with   injury   to   his person, reputation or property, or to the person, reputation or property of another in whom the former was interested; II)  The accused  did so with intent to cause  alarm  to the victim of offence;
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1