Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Lr'S Of Ramdev Kajaria vs Vijay Narayan on 4 June, 2005

7. Of course, after my rendering the judgment in Jagan Nath's case, judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Nasiruddin's case came, with the result that discussions made by me in Jagan Nath's case on the anvil of Section 5 of the Limitation Act became irrelevant, but then I maintain the reasonings given by me about the consequences of non-striking out of the defence, even in cases where the defendant has not made deposit, of payment of the rent as required by Section 13(4) of the Act to the effect that to that extent the tenant will not be entitled to the benefit under Section 13(6) of the Act.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - N P Gupta - Full Document
1