citedby: 859795

Abdul Hakim vs Jan Mohammad And Ors. on 24 July, 1950

478) & Narayan Das v. Mt. Dhania, 38 ALL. 164: (A. I. R. (3) 1916 ALL. 366), I see no force in this. There is nothing in the law to prevent a minor from becoming a transferee of the immoveable property. The fact that he was represented in the sale-deed by his grand uncle, Abdul Jalil does not invalidate the transaction.

Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Hiralal Dayaram Patil vs Bhikari Sampat Shinde on 19 January, 1970

In this respect, we may refer to the decision of Allahabad High Court in Narain Das v. Musammat Dhania (1915) I.L.R. 88 All. 154, In that case, one Musammat Dhania and others executed a sale-deed in favour of Suraj Bhan, a minor. The executants i.e. the vendors refused to get the sale-deed registered, but it was compulsorily registered by the order of the District Registrar. Suraj Bhan then sued to recover possession of the property sold, expressing his willingness to pay the unpaid consideration. The trial Court, as well as the first appellate Court dismissed the suit, treating it as one for specific performance.

Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Zafar Ahsan And Ors. vs Zubaida Khatun And Ors. on 13 May, 1929

At p. 154 another Bench of this Court in Narain Das v. Mt. Dhania [1916] 38 All. 154 held that a minor was capable of purchasing immovable property and where such a purchase has been completed by execution and registration of a sale-deed he can sue to recover possession of the property purchased upon tender of the balance of the purchase money.

Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kahan Chand vs Gyan Chand on 10 September, 1955

There, following an earlier ruling reported in--'Narain Das v. Dhania', AIR 1916 All 366 (D), Sulaiman J., held that:

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharat Bhai vs Jai Narain on 15 July, 1927

62 and Narain Das v. Mt. Dhania [1916] 38 All. 154 that a sale-deed executed in favour of a minor is valid. In our judgment there is no real distinction between cases of mortgages and of sales in favour of minors, and we agree with the Courts below in holding that, even if the plaintiff was minor on the date of the execution of the mortgage, the mortgage was enforcible.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Abdul Hakim vs Jan Mohammad And Ors. on 24 July, 1950

Hiralal Dayaram Patil vs Bhikari Sampat Shinde on 19 January, 1970

Zafar Ahsan And Ors. vs Zubaida Khatun And Ors. on 13 May, 1929

Kahan Chand vs Gyan Chand on 10 September, 1955

Bharat Bhai vs Jai Narain on 15 July, 1927