Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.40 seconds)
Documents citing Jalakanti Brahmanda Reddy Brahma Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 13 October, 2023

Chalivendra Ramakrishna Salivendra ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shaik Mohammad Moulana Abdul Kalam Sk Mm ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammad Gouse, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pothumarthi Hemanth Babi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bheemavarapu Yateendra Rama Krishna, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thota Venkateswarao vs The State Of Ap on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Olupalli Mohana Ranga Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vinta Adinarayana Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Nannapaneni Chalapathi Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nakka Pullaiah Alias Gandhi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2025

60. Learned counsel for petitioners in Criminal Petition No.5920 of 2024 argued that this very Bench on earlier occasions considered and granted anticipatory bail and therefore, the same benefit can be extended to the present petitioners. The attention of this Court is brought to Sri Settipalli Raghurami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh10 and Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh 11. In both those matters the question about Section 14A of the Act, 1989 was never raised by either side and therefore, there was no occasion for this Court to express itself on that aspect of the matter. After those orders it was in October and November 2024 only this Court had occasion to consider Section 14A of the Act, 1989 and accordingly decided the earlier referred Nakka Nagireddy's case12 and Deepak Kumar Tala's case13. Therefore, there is no merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next