Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Haryana vs Hans Raj on 8 April, 2016

Daya Kishan Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 18 November, 2025

12. Further, a perusal of the judgment in State of Punjab and anr. Versus M/s Shikha Trading Co. (supra), State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) versus Pankaj Chaudhary and ors. (supra), Astha Modi versus State of Haryana and another (supra), Dr. Mrs. Naresh Saini versus State of Haryana and another (supra) and Veer Singh DSP versus State of Haryana with State of Haryana versus Hans Raj Rathi (supra) would show that prior to the taking of any action against any 18 of 19 ::: Downloaded on - 20-11-2025 03:14:12 ::: CRM-M-12260-2022 ::19::
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Abha Rathore vs State Of Haryana on 6 May, 2016

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the cases noted above, coupled with the reasons aforementioned, this Court is of the considered view that these three identical appeals filed by the land owner(s) deserve to be partly accepted and the same are hereby allowed to the extent indicated above. As noticed above, so far as the market value of the acquired land is concerned, claim of the appellant(s)-land owner(s) in these appeals has been found squarely covered by the order dated 08.04.2016 passed by this Court in Hans Raj's case (supra). Besides this, the land owners shall also be entitled for all the statutory benefits on the amount of compensation for land as well as abovesaid amount for trees, as available to them under the relevant provisions of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R S Malik - Full Document
1