Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 263 (1.04 seconds)
Documents citing Aslam Babalal Desai vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1992

Sampat Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 1 April, 2008

In this view of the matter, keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Catena of decisions noticed herein above, and more particularly in Adri Dharan Das, in my view, prima-facie there is strong evidence of committing the offence of attempt to murder and causing the grievous hurt by use of deadly weapon to various injured persons noticed above having essential ingredients for construing the offences under Sections 307 and 326 IPC and deadly weapon of offence i.e. Axe alleged to have been used by the accused respondent No. 2 in inflicting injuries to the injured persons as noticed above on the most vital part i.e. skull and ignoring this material fact and question of recovery of Axe, the learned Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail only on the ground that the accused respondent is a serving teacher and no recovery is to be effected from him. Whereas the presence of the accused respondent at the place and time of occurrence is prima-facie established by documentary as well as oral evidence as also his active participation in commission of crime. The learned Additional Sessions Judge granted the anticipatory bail on extraneous consideration depriving the police to recover the weapon of offence i.e. axe which is material in the trial of the case.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - H R Panwar - Full Document

P.Kalpana vs The State Of Ap., on 4 June, 2018

(2004) 7 SCC 528 26 AIR 2001 SC 2023 27 1980 CriLJ 426 28 1978 CriLJ 179 29 (2000) 1 SCR 718 32 MSM,J CRLP_24624_2017 In the later judgment of the Supreme Court in Manjit Prakash & ors. V. Shobha Devi & anr30, the Apex Court discussed about the parameters for grant of bail and cancellation of bail that stand on different footings by relying on the majority judgment in Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra (referred supra), Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (referred supra).
Telangana High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Central Bureau Of Investigtation vs Kapil Wadhawan & Anr. on 30 May, 2023

q) Ld. Senior counsel submits that the Courts must favour the Accused in the interpretation of Section 167(2), Cr.P.C., being a provision to protect personal liberty, a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Reliance has been placed on Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra (supra); Judgment dated 27.03.2023 in Crl. A. Nos.
Delhi High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 4 - D K Sharma - Full Document

Smt. P Kalpana Occ Housewife R/O 63 ... vs The State Of Telangana Rep By Its Public ... on 22 December, 2016

In the later judgment of the Supreme Court in Manjit Prakash & ors. V. Shobha Devi & anr , the Apex Court discussed about the parameters for grant of bail and cancellation of bail that stand on different footings by relying on the majority judgment in Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra (referred supra), Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav (referred supra).
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 74 - Cited by 4 - M S Murthy - Full Document

Puneet Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 31 March, 2016

The next question that arises is whether bail wrongly allowed under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. can be cancelled. The counsel for the petitioner had referred to Aslam Babalal Desal Vs. State of Maharashtra 1993 AIR (SC)1, Shailesh Kishore Sinha Bipin Bihari Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand 2013(4) JLJR 249, Guria, Swayam Sevi Sansthan Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. 2009(15) SCC 75, Manjit Prakash & Ors. Vs. Shobha Devi & Anr.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - A Chaudhry - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next