Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.68 seconds)

Nana S/O Kisanrao Thokade vs Prabhakar S/O Ambadas Gosavi on 11 March, 2014

17) The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the case reported as 2013(3) Mh.L.J. 310 (Chetan Anand Shetty v. Indrajeet Chandrasen Shirole). In this case some cases of the Apex Court are considered and this Court has observed that the landlord can claim premises for starting some business even if he was not doing any business on the date of the suit.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Shri Ramesh Ravindra Khatu And Anr vs Shri. Manoj Shankar Kolwankar on 7 January, 2019

In the case of Chetan Anand Shetty Vs. Indrajeet Chandrasen Shirole, 2013 (3) Mh.L.J. 310, the learned Single Judge has observed thus, "13. For such plea being raised in revisional jurisdiction and which jurisdiction is limited, there has to be some material before the Courts below. If the materials before the Courts below rest only on the availability of other accommodation and premises to the landlord for his requirement, either of residential or non residential nature, then, the parties like the Applicants cannot claim as of right that they be permitted to raise a plea of the present nature and for the first time in the 6/8 ::: Uploaded on - 08/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 11/01/2019 06:03:47 ::: CRA368_18.doc revisional jurisdiction.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R G Ketkar - Full Document
1