Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.20 seconds)

Revanappa Reddy vs The North-East Karnataka & Anr on 9 March, 2020

2. The proposition canvassed for assailing the impugned orders of penalty by the learned counsel for 3 the petitioner is supported by a decision of this court in Kasim Ali Khan Vs. The State of Karnataka and others, [ILR 1997 KAR 3092]. In the said decision, a co-ordinate Bench of this court observed that having decided to hold an enquiry under Regulation 23 of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Servants (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations, 1971 ("Regulations", for short) in exercise of his option under Clause (b) of sub-regulation (1) of Regulation 22, it was no longer open to the disciplinary authority to go back on that decision and to revert to the power that otherwise avails to him under Regulation 23.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K S Dixit - Full Document
1