Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 267 (2.36 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Bihar vs Kirti Narayan Prasad on 30 November, 2018

Pawan Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Raj Narayan Poddar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Arvind Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Shail Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Satyadeo Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 12 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Kuwar Munni Devi @ Munni Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 12 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Kuwar Munni Devi @ Munni Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Akhileshwar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

127. In CWJC Nos. 17963 of 2023, 18408 of 2023 and 351 of 2024, the petitioners contends that their services were regularized following multiple rounds of litigation, including a Division Bench dismissal of the State's appeal in different L.P.A., which purportedly attained finality regarding their service legality prior to their superannuation. Further, the contention raised by the respondents authority that petitioners appointment was consistently classified as "illegal" and "void ab initio" by a five-member committee constituted under judicial direction, and that the matter has reached absolute finality through the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and State of Bihar vs. Devendra Sharma, which held that void appointments confer no rights to terminal benefits. The core issue for determination is whether the respondent authorities can retrospectively stop the pension of an employee, who retired after decades of service and successful prior litigation, by relying on subsequent in personam Supreme Court rulings without fresh notice or inquiry or any show cause notice before stopping pension and family pension of these petitioners respectively, and the five-men committee report was prepared behind the back of these petitioners, therefore, it is not justified to apply the report in Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 126/134 case of these petitioners without giving any opportunity of being heard.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next