Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.63 seconds)

Ram Chandra And Another vs Bipin Kumar Agnihotri on 24 July, 2019

11. The judgement in the case of New Meena Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. Lko Thru Its President (supra) relied by learned counsel for the tenants-petitioners is distinguishable on facts. In paragraph 7 of the aforesaid judgment as reported in ARC it has been noted that it was a suit for permanent injunction and the dispute was as to whether the property in dispute is existing over Khasra No.222 as claimed by the petitioner or over Khasra Nos.221 and 223 as claimed by the respondent/defendant nos.2 & 3. There was no dispute of the ownership of the concerned parties with respect to the aforesaid three Khasra plots. In that situation the issue of commission was found to be necessary. Such are not the facts of the present case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document

Shankar Lal Harayan vs Ashish Kumar Agarwal on 24 April, 2024

7. Judgment of Lucknow Bench of this Court in the matter of New Meena Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.(Supra) was given in the proceeding of original civil suit and the facts of the case are that defendant has taken two different stands, for which application filed to verify the same through Amin Commissioner, whereas in the present case, facts are entirely different, therefore, this judgment is having no relevance in the present case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N Tiwari - Full Document
1