Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (2.14 seconds)

Goyal Dipti Rajkumar vs Principal, Government Akhandanand ... on 9 April, 1996

In the case of Dr. Pramod Kumar Joshy v. Medical Council of India even the Apex Court having found and accepted that refusal of admission to the petitioner to Diploma Course in Paediatrics was contrary to the regulations framed by Indian Medical Council, noted its helplessness in granting any substantive relief as the academic sessions was almost complete and it was felt that it would not be proper to allow him admission belatedly and disturb others who have already been admitted and have been undergoing the course. The observation of the Apex Court in the penultimate line of its order to the effect "petitioner may look for admission in a future year" would generally prove to be a teasing illusion or promise of unreality to a meritorious student submits the learned Counsel for the petitioner. If a student may look for admission in the subsequent year despite her claim to admission, a Court of law cannot be helpless to grant such student admission in the next year when for no fault of the student admission was denied to her.
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

S.P. Jauhari And Ors. (Dr.) vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 20 November, 2004

6. Similar view of has been reiterated in Dr. Pramod Kumar Joshi v. Medical Council of India and Ors., (1991) 2 SCC 179; State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. v. Dr. Anupam Gupta and Ors., 1993 Supp (1) SCC 594. Their Lordships had given the reason that such admission would disturb the course and also work as a handicap to the candidates to achieve the excellence. It was observed that in such cases, the Court must take a pragmatic view of the matter in order to maintain excellence in the courses which had commenced long ago and the schedule was likely to be completed. Where the students did not have the opportunity to complete the full course, such a direction should not be issued.
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010

In this connection reference may be made to the decisions of this Court in Dr. Pramod Kumar Joshi Vs. Medical Council of India & Ors., (1991) 2 SCC 179; State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Dr. Anupam Gupta etc., AIR 1992 SC 932; State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Renuka 13 Singla & Ors., AIR 1994 SC 595; Medical Council of India Vs. Madhu Singh & Ors., (2002) 7 SCC 258; and Mridul Dhar (Minor) & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors., (2005) 2 SCC 65.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 842 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Latika Sharma vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 19 March, 2015

In this connection reference may be made to the decisions of this Court in Pramod Kumar Joshi (Dr.) v. Medical Council of India, (1991) 2 SCC 179; State of ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:49:23 :::HCHP 6 U.P. v. Dr. Anupam Gupta, 1993 Supp (1) SCC 594 : AIR 1992 SC 932; State of Punjab v. Renuka Singla, (1994) 1 SCC 175 : AIR 1994 SC 932, Medical Council of India v. Madhu Singh, (2002) 7 SCC 258; and Mridul Dhar v. Union of India, (2005) 2 SCC 65.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 17 - T S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next