Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)
Documents citing Umesh Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 24 April, 2015

Raj Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 15 November, 2017

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar Shokariya vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 15 November, 2017

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Birudala Swapna vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 15 November, 2017

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rahul Verma vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 15 November, 2017

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1