Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)

Branch Manager United India Insrance ... vs Jagdish S/O Bhanwar Lal on 31 May, 2019

IV (2014 ) CPJ 255 (NC) SAHARA INDIA COMMERCIAL CORPORATON LTD. & ANR. V/S GOMTI DEVI & ORS. esa ekuuh; jk"Vªh; vk;ksx us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %& Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) - Insurance - Death claim - Delay in intimation - Claim repudiated - Alleged deficiency in service - District Forum allowed complaint - State Commission dismissed appeal - Hence revision - As per policy, petitioners are liable pay Rs. 1,00,000 as ordered by District Forum - Petitioners want to get rid of their liability - Petitioners have made a vain attempt to lead gullible people up the garden path.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abdul Razzak S/O Saljaim Khan vs Iffico Tokio Gen. Ins. Ltd. Through ... on 30 May, 2019

IV (2014 ) CPJ 255 (NC) SAHARA INDIA COMMERCIAL CORPORATON LTD. & ANR. V/S GOMTI DEVI & ORS. esa ekuuh; jk"Vªh; vk;ksx us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS %& Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) - Insurance - Death claim - Delay in intimation - Claim repudiated - Alleged deficiency in service - District Forum allowed complaint - State Commission dismissed appeal - Hence revision - As per policy, petitioners are liable pay Rs. 1,00,000 as ordered by District Forum - Petitioners want to get rid of their liability - Petitioners have made a vain attempt to lead gullible people up the garden path.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sahara India vs Smt. Mooli Devi W/O Lat. Lala Ram Mali on 6 April, 2017

Both these documents are not in dispute but thereafter vide its letter dated 27.9.2005 and 26.9.2006 the insurance company has admitted its liability as per table no. II and in view of the above this Commission has already decided the controversy in Lakshmi Devi (supra) and Forum below has also considered the judgment passed by the National Commission in Gomti Devi (supra). Hence in view of the letters dated 27.9.2005 and 26.9.2006 it can safely be concluded that insurance company is liable as per table no. II. Hence, the Sahara India could not be saddled with any liability.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1