Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.02 seconds)
Documents citing Deshraj Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 November, 2022

Ajeet And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 February, 2025

2. I have also heard Mr. Atul Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for applicant-Deshraj @ Deshraj Singh Panwar, in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No. 40256 of 2023 (Deshraj @ Deshraj Singh Panwar Vs. State of U.P. and another), the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite party-1 and Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel representing first informant/opposite party-2.
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Umashankar vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 18 July, 2023

7. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, in my view, prima facie it appears to be a case under Section 302 IPC. Photographs submitted by the applicant is not a part of the case diary. The case of Deshraj Singh (supra) does not make any help to the applicant at this stage, as in the said case a final report was submitted by the Investigating Officer after investigation in the case, which was lodged under Section 302 and 120-B IPC and subsequently on the basis of protest petition, the applicant was summoned but the position in the present case is different. The investigation in the matter is going on and so far ample evidence has been collected by the Investigating Officer in respect of the murder of the deceased in this case. Since the case clearly falls into the category of cases which have been mentioned in Section 438(6) CrPC, (as applicable in U.P. by way of U.P. Act No. 4 of 2019, Section 2, w.e.f 1.6.2019), in my view, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. Hence, without going into the merits of the case, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sarika Pathak And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 April, 2026

10. Per contra, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2 has submitted that the appellants are attempting to use the plot belonging to Opposite Party No. 2. It is further submitted that her husband has already filed Civil Suit No. 294 of 2021 (Deshraj vs. State of U.P. and another) for permanent injunction, seeking restraint against the defendants from using the said plot as a passage and from interfering with peaceful possession. The said suit was filed on 09.08.2021, and written statements have already been filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, namely the State of U.P. and the Gram Panchayat. The matter is presently sub judice before the competent civil court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1