Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Sunil Sharma on 31 January, 2018

State Bank Of India vs Mr. Afroz Khan on 16 February, 2021

Ltd. judgment (Date of Judgment 7th February, 2013). Reliance has also been placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Sunil Sharma passed in RFA 340/2015 on 31.01.2018 in which the pronouncement has been made regarding appreciation of documentary evidence in cases of public financial institution, appreciation/certification of electronic evidence etc.
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Sh. Watsalya Kumar Singh on 9 February, 2021

29. The evidence in this case is primarily documentary. The documents tendered in evidence by the plaintiff are the documents maintained by a bank in the ordinary course of its business. Though the exceptions cannot be ruled out, but generally taking a due notice of the banking business, these documents can be considered to be duly executed in due course of the business and capable of binding the parties into a contractual relationship. I am also supported by the judgments of our own High Court in the case of Kamini Sharma (supra) and Sunil Sharma (supra) on this aspect.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs Sh. Deepak Gupta on 4 December, 2021

28. The evidence in this case is primarily documentary. At the cost of repetition, the documents tendered in evidence by the plaintiff are the documents maintained by a bank in the ordinary course of its business. Though the exceptions cannot be ruled out, but generally taking a due notice of the banking business, these documents can be considered to be duly executed in due course of the business and capable of binding the parties into a contractual relationship. I am also supported by the judgments of our own High Court in the case of Kamini Sharma (supra) and Sunil Sharma (supra) on this aspect.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Punjab National Bank vs Kamal Eating Corner (Proprietorship) on 15 February, 2021

20.The judgments of our own High Court viz. ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another' passed on 31.01.2018 in RFA No. 297/2015 and in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Sunil Sharma passed in RFA 340/2015 on 31.01.2018 can be read with profit on this aspect. In these judgments a pronouncement has been made regarding appreciation of documentary evidence in cases of public financial institution, appreciation/certification of electronic evidence etc. and the same are also applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under CS (Comm.) No. 591/2019 Page 6 of 10 consideration.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1