Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.88 seconds)
Documents citing Jagdish Sahu And Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh 49 ... on 15 January, 2018

Smt. Rajni Lodha vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 September, 2021

Criminal Case No. 10026/2007 on 12.2.2008 (Parties being Laxman Sahu and another Vs. Smt. Abha Sahu and another), in which, the proceedings against relatives of the husband including husband were quashed on the ground that the FIR was lodged only after receipt of the notice of the petition for restitution of conjugal rights. But, the facts of the present case 6 are different; therefore, the proposition of law laid down in the aforesaid case law is not attracted in this case.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 11 - A K Sharma - Full Document

Satish Dhakad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 December, 2018

On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that motorcycle belongs to the present applicant who has not been identified in the T.I.P. and has also been enlarged on bail. Even otherwise, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the vehicle in custody and allowed it to deteriorate. Applicant, seeks parity with the case of Jagdish Vs. State of M.P. (CRR 5063/2018).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Hafizur Rahman vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 10 December, 2021

In the most recent judgment in State of Himachal Pradesh & Page No.# 6/7 Anr. vs. Shashi Kumar, (2019) 3 SCC 653 the earlier decisions governing the principles of compassionate appointment were discussed and analysed. Speaking for the bench, Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud reiterated that appointment to any public post in the service of the State has to be made on the basis of principles in accord with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule. The Dependent of a deceased government employee are made eligible by virtue of the policy on compassionate appointment and they must fulfill the norms laid down by the State's policy.
Gauhati High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1