Madan Singla vs Arun Kumar on 11 July, 2023
11. However, in my considered opinion, reliance placed on this
judgment is misconceived on two counts. Firstly, it is required to be
noticed that in paras 4 and 5 of the complaint, the respondent-
complainant has mentioned that the cheque was presented again on
an assurance given by the petitioner, while this was not the case in
Vanitha's case (supra) and additionally this scenario is specifically
covered by the reasoning given in MSR's case (supra).