Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (1.46 seconds)Documents citing
Vrc Township P Ltd., Delhi vs Ito, New Delhi on 14 October, 2020
Shyam Products P.Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-23(3), New Delhi on 11 October, 2022
This issue is
also considered in the Order of VRC Township Pvt. Ltd., (supra)
following the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of
Kalpana Shantilal Haria vs. ACIT [2017] 100 CCH 165 (Bom.).
Following the same reasons for decision, we set aside the Orders of
the authorities below and quash the reopening of the assessment in
15
ITA No.1932/Del/2019
both the assessment years under appeals. All additions stand deleted.
Accordingly, appeals of the Assessee are allowed."
Optimist Electronics P.Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-19(2), New Delhi on 31 January, 2023
Mahalaxmi Ornaments House Pvt. Ltd., ... vs Ito,Ward-16(1), New Delhi on 16 June, 2023
Similar view has also been taken by
the coordinate benches of the Tribunal in the orders in the cases of VRC Township Pvt.
Ltd. Vs. ITO (supra) and Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and it was held
that in a case where the proposal for reopening was u/s. 147B of the Act which was
approved u/s. 151 of the Act as it is then as per judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High in
the case of Smt. Kalpana Shantilal Hariya Vs. ACIT (supra) the reopening on the basis
of such approval without application of mind has to be held as invalid being bad in law.
Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills Pvt Ltd, ... vs Ito Ward - 16(1), New Delhi on 17 December, 2020
in the case of VRC Township Pvt. Ltd., Delhi (supra).
Following the reasons for the same, we set aside the Orders
of the authorities below and quash the reopening of the
assessment under section 147/148 of the I.T. Act.
Resultantly, all additions stand deleted. In view of the above
findings, the other grounds are left with academic
discussion only. Accordingly, appeal of the Assessee
allowed.
Sky Blue Infotech Pvt Ltd,New Delhi vs Ito Ward - 23(4), New Delhi on 13 December, 2024
Sumangal Techpark (P) Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito Ward - 24(3), New Delhi on 23 February, 2023
This issue is
also considered in the Order of VRC Township Pvt. Ltd., (supra)
following the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of
Kalpana Shantilal Haria vs. ACIT [2017] 100 CCH 165 (Bom.).
Following the same reasons for decision, we set aside the Orders of
the authorities below and quash the reopening of the assessment in
both the assessment years under appeals. All additions stand deleted.
Accordingly, appeals of the Assessee are allowed."
Madhu Apartment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs Ito, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi on 2 February, 2021
This issue is also considered in the Order of VRC
Township Pvt. Ltd., (supra) following the decision of Hon'ble
Bombay High Court in the case of Kalpana Shantilal Haria
vs., ACIT [2017] 100 CCH 165 (Bom.). Following the same
reasons for decision, we set aside the Orders of the
authorities below and quash the reopening of the
assessment in both the assessment years under appeals. All
86
ITA.Nos.3869 & 3870/Del./2018 M/s. Madhu
Apartment Private Limited, Delhi.
Sh. Hafizuddin Hazi,, New Delhi vs Ito, New Delhi on 16 February, 2022
(iii) VRC Township Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, ITA No.1503/Del/2017, dated
14.10.2020.
Davinder Kaur Marwah, Delhi vs Ito Ward-40(2), New Delhi on 23 February, 2022
7. VRC Township Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, ITA No.1503/Del/2017,
dt. 14.10.2020