Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Gaon Sabha Thariya Distt. Hardoi Thru ... vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Revenue ... on 18 February, 2019

Nand Lal And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Lko. ... on 9 May, 2025

"(i). Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned orders dated 10.4.23 Annexure No.1, case no. 402/2023 Gaon Sabha Vs. State, order dated 02.06.2023 case no.02/2023 Pradeep Kumar Vs. State, order dated 11.8.23, case no. 123/23, Shambhu Nath Vs. State, order dated 10.4.23 case no. 03/2023 Gaon Sabha Vs. State, order dated 02.6.2023 case no.03/2023, Shiv Pratap Vs. State, order dated 12.09.23 case no. 13/2023 Archna Yadav vs. State, all order passed by consolidation officer respectively.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Ashish Kumr And 8 Others vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 7 February, 2023

"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus Deputy District Magistrate/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Jaunpur to decide the Restoration Application filed by the petitioner No.1 in Case No. T. 202214360418252 (Gaon Sabha vs. State of U.P.) under Section 101 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J Banerji - Full Document

Indra Pal Singh vs State Of Up And 4 Others on 18 April, 2024

4. Perusal of the instructions dated 15.03.2024, under the signature of Sub-Divisional Officer, Shikohabad, Firozabad shows that in the second page of the instructions, just below the heading of the additional pleas, it has been recited that the Gata no. 297, which was old gata no. 268 referable to the Akar Patra 45, Khata no.579, it was recorded as abadi. With respect to the Fasli Year 1388-1394, Gata No.551, an order was passed by the Pargana Adhikari on 06.04.1983 mentioning therein that the Gata No. 297 Rakba 0.03 decimal (0.012 hectare) was reserved for Holi land. However, due to typographical error at the time of preparation of Khatauni, Gata No.297 Rakba 0.10 decimal was earmarked for Holi land and at the time of presentation of present petition, appropriate remedial action has been taken mentioning therein that the land earmarked for Holi land is 0.03 decimal (0.012 hectare) and the residue land of Rakba 0.07 decimal, i.e. 0.028 hectares should be earmarked for abadi. Consequently, proceedings purported to be under the relevant statutes being Case no.T202401260201541 Gaon Sabha vs. State of U.P. was initiated on 11.03.2024, wherein remedial action has been taken in that regard. Insofar as, Khata no.580, Gata No.294M, Rakba 0.040 hectare is concerned the same is referable to Gandhi Park and Khata No.583, Gata No.294M, Rakba 0.030 is earmarked for Marriage House and according to the instructions, there is no encroachment over the same.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Om Prakash Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 6 September, 2023

I have perused the contents of writ petition as well as the prayer with the assistance of Sri Sanjay Kumar Ray, learned Standing Counsel for State and considering that prayer is to expedite restoration application No.1541 of 2023 arising out of case No.187 ( Gaon Sabha Vs. State) under Section 48(3) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, pending before respondent No.2, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with following direction :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document
1