Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Gujarat State Forest Development ... vs Budhabhai Kamjibhai Nizama on 31 August, 2006

Geb And Anr. vs Maganbhai Chhaganbhai Patel on 7 September, 2006

If that is discharged then onus shifts upon the employer to disprove the facts. In this case, it is not disproved by petitioner. The petitioners have not produced total musters before the Labour Court. This aspect has been considered by this Court in SCA No. 5566 of 1999 in the case of Gujarat State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. v. Budhabhai Kamjibhai Nizama dated 31.8.2006. The relevant para.11, 12 and 15 are quoted as under:
Gujarat High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

Bharatbhai Punamchand Gandhi vs Deputy Executive Engineer & on 15 June, 2015

4. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner invited this Court's attention to the decision in case of Gujarat State Forest Development Corporation Limited Vs. Budhabhai Kamjibhai Nizama, reported in 2006-JX(Guj)-0-405 and provision of Section 25-B of the I.D. Act and Exhibit-13 in support of his submission that the Court erred in wrongfully concluding that the petitioner had not completed 240 days. The counsel, however, could not explain from the material available on record as to was there any justification whatsoever for raising the dispute, in fact, the entire memo of the claim statement did not reveal any justifiable cause which would merit consideration for ignoring the same.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S R Brahmbhatt - Full Document
1