Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 101 (1.25 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Nibro Limited vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 6 March, 1990

Prakash Parcel Services Limited R/By ... vs Beml Limited on 30 January, 2025

44. It is apparent from the Rule that in a suit by or against a Corporation, the plead have to be signed or verified on behalf of the Corporation by any Secretary, Director other Principal Officer of the Corporation, who is able to depose to the facts of the case. It was laid down by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Nibro Limited v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., MANU/DE/0138/1991: AIR 1991 Delhi 25 that Order 29 Rule 1 of CPC does not authorize the persons to 37 Com.O.S.NO. 25714/2017 institute the suit but to sign and verify the pleadings. was observed that:
Bangalore District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Yaduvanshi Real Estate Pvt. Ltd vs Sh. Arun Ahuja on 6 August, 2020

27. Further, in the case of M/s Nibro Limited v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1991 Delhi 25, it was held that Order 29, Rule 1 of CPC does not authorize persons mentioned therein to institute suits on behalf of the corporation. It only authorizes them to sign and verify the pleadings on behalf of the corporation. The relevant extract of the present judgment is reproduced as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Digitally vs M/S Hindustan General Industries ... on 1 December, 2021

And others AIR SC 2419, Uma Andarjanam and other, Appellants v. Neelakandan Namboodiri and other, Respondents AIR Kerala 314, Saljing A. Sangma v. Smt. Bilmoni A. Sangma AIR 2014 Meghalaya 15, M/s. Nibro Limited v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1991 Delhi 25, Al­Amin Seatrans Ltd. v. Owners and Party interested in Vessel M.V. 'Loyal Bird' AIR 1995 Calcutta 169, Abdul Hakim v. Habib Khan AIR 1998 Rajasthan 157, Marguerite Chawla v. Miss Kiran Abnashi Chawla 2015 X AD (Delhi)653, Gaiv Dineshaw Irani v. Tehmtan Irani (2014) 8 SCC 294.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sunita Garg vs M/S Arvind Chemi Synthetics Pvt. Ltd on 31 October, 2022

"In the decision in M/s Nibro Limited Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd., MANU/DE/0138/1991 : AIR 1991 Delhi 25 after taking note of a series of decisions on the subject the view taken by this Court was that unless a power to institute suit is specificlaly conferred on a particular director he has no authority to institute suit on behalf of the company. It must, therefore, follow that although the plaint was signed and verified properly but the Sunita Garg Vs. M/s Arvind Chemi Synthetic Pvt. Ltd.{CS(Comm) 41/20} Page 25 of 36 suit was not instituted by a duly authorized person on behalf of the plaintiff."
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Avenir Foods (P) Ltd vs M/S P.V.R. Limited on 14 November, 2022

9.7 Reliance may be placed upon the law laid down in M/s Nibro Limited v. National Insurance Company Limited AIR 1991 Delhi 25, Shubh Shanti Services Limited Vs. Manjula S. Agarwalla and others (2005) 5 SCC 30, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Ltd.Vs. Gurinder Singh and another CRM-A-1548- MA-2015 (O&M) dated 12.02.2020 and Bombay High Court in Balaji Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Goa Vs. M/s. Samudra Ropes Pvt.Ltd, 2011 (4) Criminal Court Cases 495.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next