Mrs.Vijayarani vs State Rep.By on 22 December, 2015
4.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that on 11.02.2014 already the complaint was registered by the 1st respondent-Police in Crime No.83 of 2014 under Sections 406, 420 & 120(b) IPC against the accused persons viz., 1)Leelabai, 2)Ajithkumar, 3)Pathmachand @ Pathmaraj Jain, 4)Marimuthu. While so, again the second complaint was given on the same set of allegations only to harass the petitioners herein. The second complaint on the same set of allegations is not maintainable in the eye of law. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the judgment reported in 2015(3) MWN (Cr.) 300 (K.R.Latha Vs. State, rep by Inspector of Police, 7th Team Central Crime Brnach, Vepery, Chennai) in support of his contention that the second complaint on the same set of allegations is not maintainable.