Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.42 seconds)

R.Vasudevan vs The Secretary To The Government on 3 September, 2021

"5. Admittedly the appellant does not possess the required educational qualifications. Under the circumstances the appellant would not be entitled to the relaxation. The Principal erred in granting him the relaxation. Since the date of relaxation the appellant had been paid his salary on the revised scale. However, it is not on account of any misrepresentation made by the appellant that the benefit of the higher pay scale was given to him but by wrong construction made by the Principal for which the appellant cannot be held to be at fault. Under the circumstances the amount paid till date may not be recovered from the appellant.. . ." (Emphasis added) 12.4 In 1995 Supp (3) SCC 722 (NAND KISHORE SHARMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS), while considering the question of recovery of amount paid by mistake, it was observed :-
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S S Sundar - Full Document
1