Het Ram vs Ramswaroop Bhambhu & Anr on 24 November, 2008
In this view of the matter upon perusal of
the order impugned, it is revealed that the learned
trial Court has rightly observed in the order that the
agricultural land cannot be attached in view of
Section 37 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. The judgment
cited by learned counsel for the petitioner rendered
by Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Sagar Mal
(supra) is based upon entirely different facts and the
proceedings under the Sales Tax Act. Here in this
case, the facts are entirely different then the case
cited by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Therefore, there is no force in the contentions raised
by the petitioner in this writ petition. As such, no
interference is required in the impugned order dated
3.7.2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.