Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 477 (1.05 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India vs Pushpa Rani & Ors on 29 July, 2008

Ravindra Kumar Suthar vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In rebuttal, learned counsel for the applicants besides reiterating the contentions as noted above, submitted that the reliance placed by the respondents on the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Pushpa Rani (supra) is misplaced and distinguishable on facts. In Pushpa Rani, the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertains to restructuring by merging the Group „C‟ & and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said 2026.04.07 JITENDRA 14:55:05 RAJ MEHTA +05'30' 29 O.A. NO. 211/2023 & Connected OAs judgment does not support the case of the respondents. Further, it is submitted that the judgment passed by Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of BSNL apply in the facts of the present case and the order passed by CAT, Mumbai Bench in OA No. 327/2023 as well the CAT, Hyderabad Bench. The respondents have erroneously interpreted the instructions contained in the subsequent clarification dated 14.07.2023. According to the learned counsel there is no creation of any new post under the scheme of RBE No.155/2022 therefore; the impugned orders are bad in law.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dullamanji D. vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Bhatt vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dinesh Kumar Yadav vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In rebuttal, learned counsel for the applicants besides reiterating the contentions as noted above, submitted that the reliance placed by the respondents on the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Pushpa Rani (supra) is misplaced and distinguishable on facts. In Pushpa Rani, the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertains to restructuring by merging the Group „C‟ & and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said 2026.04.07 JITENDRA 14:55:05 RAJ MEHTA +05'30' 29 O.A. NO. 211/2023 & Connected OAs judgment does not support the case of the respondents. Further, it is submitted that the judgment passed by Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of BSNL apply in the facts of the present case and the order passed by CAT, Mumbai Bench in OA No. 327/2023 as well the CAT, Hyderabad Bench. The respondents have erroneously interpreted the instructions contained in the subsequent clarification dated 14.07.2023. According to the learned counsel there is no creation of any new post under the scheme of RBE No.155/2022 therefore; the impugned orders are bad in law.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashish Y Chaturvedi vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devendra K Garg vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Palakdhari Singh vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In rebuttal, learned counsel for the applicants besides reiterating the contentions as noted above, submitted that the reliance placed by the respondents on the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Pushpa Rani (supra) is misplaced and distinguishable on facts. In Pushpa Rani, the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertains to restructuring by merging the Group „C‟ & and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said 2026.04.07 JITENDRA 14:55:05 RAJ MEHTA +05'30' 29 O.A. NO. 211/2023 & Connected OAs judgment does not support the case of the respondents. Further, it is submitted that the judgment passed by Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of BSNL apply in the facts of the present case and the order passed by CAT, Mumbai Bench in OA No. 327/2023 as well the CAT, Hyderabad Bench. The respondents have erroneously interpreted the instructions contained in the subsequent clarification dated 14.07.2023. According to the learned counsel there is no creation of any new post under the scheme of RBE No.155/2022 therefore; the impugned orders are bad in law.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramashankar Yadav vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Western Railway vs Minita J Rathore on 6 April, 2026

In Pushpa Rani (supra), the policy dated 19.10.2003 pertained to restructuring by merging Group „C‟ and Group „D‟ posts to create a new cadre, thereby involving a change in cadre structure. The policy itself clarified that such instructions would not apply in cases where there is no change in duties or designation. In the present case, there is no change in cadre, duties, or designation. The exercise undertaken is purely for financial upgradation to address stagnation. Hence, the said judgment does not support the case of the respondents.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next