Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing Bibhuti Bhusan Jena vs Union Of India And Others ....... .. ... on 15 September, 2010

Unknown vs Union Of India Through The Secretary To ... on 13 October, 2011

9. The learned counsel for the applicant has also supported his submissions detailed hereinabove with case law cited in (1997) 11 SCC 373 titled Bibhuti Bhushan Chaudhry Vs. Union of India & Others, wherein it was held that period of suspension during which subsistence allowance was paid is includible as qualifying service for the purpose of Pension (Para 3).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India } vs J.S.Kharat Ig } on 4 February, 2014

18. The Central Administrative Tribunal has partially allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent following the mandate of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in BIBHUTI BHUSHAN CHOUDHARY's case (supra) and has held that the respondent's period of suspension be treated as qualifying service for the purpose of computation of pension and other pensionary benefits. In view of the above discussion, we see no infirmity or perversity in the findings of the Central Administrative Tribunal so as to interfere in exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We are therefore, ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2014 23:12:51 ::: RNG 15 wp673.05 of the considered view that the respondent is entitled to the benefit of the period of suspension to be counted for the purpose of qualifying service for pensionary benefits.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G S Kulkarni - Full Document
1