Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 52 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing Mehsana District Central Cooperative ... vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. [Alongwith ... on 28 January, 2004

Bijayabai Sambhaji Kapse And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 4 September, 2019

The proposition as enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mehsana District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others Vs. State of Gujarat and others (2004) 2 SCC 463 is also of no assistance to the petitioners, in light of the fact that the son of petitioner No.1 was a beneficiary of the order of the respondent No.2 dated 06/09/2014, which has been suppressed by them in the petition. In so far as the the judgment in Mst.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A G Gharote - Full Document

Arunava Sasmal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 January, 2023

13. So far as the locus standi of the present writ petitioner is concerned in challenging the impugned licence, the matter is set at rest in view of the decision taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mehsana (supra) case where it has been categorically observed that any aggrieved citizens can always bring to the notice of the Court the inaction of the statutory authorities and/or if it is found that the State Authorities have acted contrary to the statutory requirement and thus failed to perform their statutory obligation.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harikrishnan M vs Accountant General on 24 March, 2023

In Central Bank of India v. Nitin (Civil Appeal No. 5111 of 2022) the Supreme Court reiterated that where there is a financial eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment under the scheme, Rules which provide for financial criteria are valid and such lawful rules will have to be strictly followed as otherwise the quota reserved for compassionate appointment would be filled up excluding others, who might be in a greater and far more acute financial distress.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dilipbhai vs State on 26 May, 2008

11.2. At this stage, it is appropriate to refer the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter between Mehsana District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. V. State of Gujarat & Ors. reported in AIR 2004 SC 1576, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed: ýSIn the facts and circumstances stated above, the High Court by the impugned order issued a writ of mandamus, directing Respondents 4 and 5 to take appropriate action against the appellants in accordance with the provisions contained in the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act and the Rules framed thereunder. We do not see any infirmity in the impugned order. The Acts and Rules are made to be followed and not to be violated. When the statute prescribes the norms to be followed, it has to be in that fashion. Converse would be contrary to lawýý. [emphasis supplied].
Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - K M Thaker - Full Document

Virendra Kumar Tyagi vs Ghaziabad Development Authority And ... on 27 October, 2005

11. Under Section 55 of the Act the State Government has been empowered to make Rules. Under Sub-section (1) of Section 55 of the Act the Rules can be made by the State Government by notification in the Gazette. In the present case, the order prescribing rate of mutation charges has not been gazetted which is also admitted by Sri A. K. Misra, learned Counsel for the respondents. It is simply an order issued by the State Government. It is well-settled that if a statute provides that an act that has to be done in a particular manner then it has to be done in that manner alone or not at all. The Apex Court in the case of Dhanajaya Ready v. State of Karnataka (2001) 4 SCC 9 ; Commissioner of Income tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H. Chaswala and Ors. ; Mehsana District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Gujarat and Ors. and Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma , has held that where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 8 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

Smt. Kesari Devi W/O Shri Gulab Singh, ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ... on 18 August, 2005

37. However, in Mehsana District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Gujarat and Ors., , the Apex Court observed that where there are allegations of violation of statutory rules which have been brought to the notice of the authorities and the authorities concerned fail to perform their statutory obligations, any aggrieved citizen can bring the inaction to the notice of the Court, which may pass the appropriate orders.
Allahabad High Court Cites 164 - Cited by 16 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next