Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Anil Kumar Yadav Son Of Sri Rama Yadav vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 27 August, 2007

Ram Naresh Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home & Anr. on 7 February, 2019

Perusal of the records would go to show that before invoking power under rule 8(2)(b), no satisfaction has been recorded by the competent authority as to why holding of disciplinary inquiry is not possible in the facts of the present case? The action of the Superintendent of Police, therefore, is found to be in teeth of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others, 1985 (3) SCC 398 as well as subsequent judgements of this Court in Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - R Kumar - Full Document

Rati Ram vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 12 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Ram Bresh Yadav vs The State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 15 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Shavez Khan vs The State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 15 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Arun Kumar Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 15 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Amrish Kant Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 15 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Nitin Tomar vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 15 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Rahul Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 16 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Sachin Singh vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 20 December, 2022

6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document
1   2 Next