Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1263 (0.80 seconds)

Ca No.42/14 (Ashok Kumar vs . State) on 11 December, 2014

After sometime, I was called by Police through the phone. The accused who is present in the court today was driving the bus. The accused was driving the bus in normal speed. The accused was arrested by the police vide memo exhibited as Page 4 of 21 CA No.42/14 (Ashok Kumar Vs. State) PW­1/B bears my signature at point A. I record my statement. I have nothing to say about this case. I can identify the case property if shown to me. The identity of the case property is not disputed by defence counsel.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs . State And Ors. on 30 October, 2017

24. It was submitted that it was proved on record that appellant was entrusted with the property documents and it was also an admitted fact on the part of appellant that he had sold the property to Madan Mohan Patra depriving respondents no.2 to 4 of their legal share in the property Page no.12 /21   CA No. 02/17 Ashok Kumar Vs. State and Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 20 August, 2024

However, the entire information given is without requisite details and facts and figures and copies of relevant documents. In the report/replies there is no claim that entire waste generated daily is processed/treated which implies addition to legacy waste every day. Particulars regarding location and other details of material recovery facility have not been given. Particulars regarding dumping ground, if any and composting, and recycling facilities have also not been given. Complete details regarding utilization of composted/recycled/treated waste have also not been provided. O. A. No. 480/2023 Ashok Kumar Vs. State of UP & Ors
National Green Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs The State on 19 August, 2016

20. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the appellant fails to successfully assail the impugned judgment. The Ld. Trial Court has analyzed the facts properly and correctly came to the conclusion CA No. 03/15 Ashok Kumar v. State Page No. 11 of 12 Ashok Kumar v. State which is according to the facts on record and the relevant legal provisions. Therefore, no flaw can be find out in the impugned judgment. As such, it is upheld and the appeal stands dismissed. Accused be taken into custody and sent to jail to serve the sentence. Copy of the judgment be provided to the appellant.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

< Xü Kû vs Mø M÷ F÷ '÷ŒØ‚Ú Û Üy÷ on 23 September, 2009

Q I R R SUT V W XYW Z [ X)W \P]_^`]Ma(b c W d Xe^fV d ^g]9^ihjd a kml W(^)[-^ V W-X)d a V d n kon W pqcM]rp W n ^1k XY]ts ]un p2[ Z ^CV W d v v W crc_d n ^ ^CV d ^ ^CV W k W d ^CVE[ Z w,X x6y1V ]MzO{PW n V d a}| W W n b d l a$W k&x ~€ xtTPV W]3k W n ^ ]3^'‚ƒ[ Z/^CV W-d b b l a$W k „…d v v W crc_d n ^ \†^CV W‡]3k W n ^ ]_^'‚o[ Z/^CV Wˆk W b W d a$W k \†^CV W ]3k W n ^ ]_^'‚ [ Z ^CV W‰]Mn‹ŠŒl&X…W k&\ ^CV W ]3k W n ^ ]_^'‚ [ Z ^CV W[ Z ZYW n k&]Mn p8s W V ]3b c3W \ ^CV W(zEd n n W X`]Mn hŽV ]3b V ^CV W| l ahjd a| W ]Mn p-kPX ]9s W n \ ^CV W(b d l a$W[ Z†k W d ^CV:[ Zjw,X+x6y1V ]uz‘{PW n \&^CV W ]Mn s W a’^ ]3p d ^ ] [ n ]Mn b crl k&]un p ^CV W zEW b V d n ]3b d c“]Mn a v W b ^ ]3[ n X…W v [PX)^ d n k ^CV W v [&a’^CzE[mX)^…W z“X W v [PX ^1V d s W‰| W W nvqX…[ v W X c9‚vqX…[ s W k-| ‚^CV W‰vqX…[&a$W b l ^ ]3[ n xTmV W X W ]ra(n [ ^CV ]Mn p2hŽV ]3b V:b [&l c3k*a V d ^ ^…W Xi^CV W s W X d b ]_^'‚[ Z†^CV W-vqX [ a’W b l ^ ]3[ nh”]_^Cn W a a’W a [PX Z…d cMa ]_Z)‚E^ V W,b c3d ]uz•[ Z ^CV W–vqX…[&a$W b l ^ ] [ n x ~ —’xr˜Mn s ] W h [ Z™^CV W ZY[mX W p [&]un p X…W d a’[ n a \^CV W b [ n a$b ]3W n b Wš[ Z™^CV ]Maš›†[&l&X ^™]Ma b [ z v c W ^…W c9‚oa’d ^ ]raœZC]3W kƒ^CV d ^g^CV WovqX [ a’W b l ^ ]3[ n%V d a2| W W nˆd | c3W^…[ža l b b W a aœZCl crc9‚ |qX+]un p8V [ zEW ^CV W,b V d X…p W d p d ]Mn a’^ ^CV W d b b l a$W k$„qd v v W cMc_d n ^ x ~œŸ x ˜ d z [ Z¡^CV Wb [&n a ] k W X W k[ v ]un ] [&n8^ V d ^‡^+V W X)W:]ra n [ ]Mn Z ])X+z ]9^)‚ [ Xi] cMc W p d cM]_^)‚ ]Mn ^+V WiŠŒl k p zEW n ^ k d ^YW k(¢’£ xt¤ £ x3¥ ¤ ¤œŸ [ Zq^fV W–crW€d Xfn W$k¦^§XY]3d c ›i[ql X'^qd n k–^ŒV W†Š¨l k p&z–W n ^ [ Zqb [ n s ]3b ^ ]3[ n l n k W X a$W b ^ ]3[ n a”¥ £ ©ª„C~$¤’ «™˜.¬ ›]Ma}V W X…W | ‚ b [ n ZC]6XCz W k x ~ £ xU«­a®X…W p d X k&a‡^CV W¯a$W n ^…W n b W \g^CV Wod v v W cMc_d n ^ V d a%| W W n°a’W n ^…W n b W k±^…[²a ]Mz v c3W Page numbers of Statistics Page numbers CA No.17 of 2006 Ashok Kumar v. State ³M´ µq¶+³M·’¸ ¹ ´Eº ¹ »}¼Y¸P¶}½±µ º ¶ ³3¸ ¾•¸ ¼ »C¿q¶…º ºÀ´ ¸ ¹ »C¿ ·%½ ¹ ¾À½ƒ¼C³u¹ º™¸ ¼8Áe· Â6Ã$Ä3ŠŠŪÆYÇ ³M¹ ¾ º ¼ ½ È É3»–¸ ¼µ ½ Ê ´ º ¹ »Ë¸ ¼Ë̎¿ ³3Í ¿•· ³M´ µ É3º±³u´ µ&¶+³r·$¸ ¹ ´Eº ¹ » ¼Y¸P¶ ½¯µ º ¶ ³3¸ ¾Î¸ ¼ ¸ ¹ º ´E¸ ¹ »C¿–¼Y¸P¶ »C¿ ºË¸ ¼ ¼Yº ¹ Í º È ¹ ¾ º ¶ ·$º Í » ³3¸ ¹Ï Ð Ñ Ò6Ó Ô½ ¹ ¾· ³M´ µ É3º³M´ µq¶ ³r·$¸ ¹ ´ º ¹ »&¼Y¸m¶ ½8µ º ¶ ³3¸ ¾Õ¸ ¼ ¸ ¹ ºEÊ º ½ ¶e½ ¹ ¾(¼C³M¹ º ¸ ¼gÁe· Â Ï Ä Å Å ÅªÆYÇ¡³M¹(¾ º ¼…½ È É_» ¸ ¼†µ ½ Ê ´ º ¹ »¡¸ ¼e̎¿ ³ Í ¿ · ³u´ µ É º²³u´ µ&¶+³r·$¸ ¹ ´Eº ¹ »¼Y¸P¶8½Öµ º ¶ ³3¸ ¾Ö¸ ¼‰Ï ´ ¸ ¹ »C¿ ·ž¼Y¸P¶8»C¿ º±¸ ¼ ¼Yº ¹ Í º×È ¹ ¾ º ¶ ·’º Í » ³3¸ ¹ Ø$Å$Ù Ç6Ú Ò.Ó ÔÛ®Üm¸ »C¿ »C¿ º ·$º ¹ »…º ¹ Í º · ¿ ½ Ý º Þ º º ¹ ¸P¶…¾ º ¶…º ¾ »…¸ ¶ È ¹ Í ¸ ¹ Í È ¶f¶…º ¹ » É9ÊE½ ¹ ¾8Þ º ¹ º$¼C³_»q¸ ¼ ·$º Í » ³3¸ ¹ Ù Ï ß Ô­¶ Â6Ó Â3Ôà ¿ ½ ·/½ Ér·$¸8Þ º º ¹Eám¶)½ ¹ »…º ¾& Ø$ß ÂrÒ ¼C³M¹ ¾â»C¿ ½ »Û¶ º ½ ·’¸ ¹ ·ã¼Y¸m¶†³u´ µ ¸&· ³u¹ á-· È Í ¿8½:·$º ¹ »…º ¹ Í º ½ ¶ º ½ Ér·$¸:º É_½ Þ ¸P¶ ½ »…º ¾ ³M¹ ¾ º »)½ ³rÉ ³M¹Ö»C¿ º¦¸m¶ ¾ º ¶â³_» ·$º Ét¼C–äm¿ º ½ µ µ º ÉrÉ3½ ¹ »¿ ½ ·å¶ º æ&È º ·’»…º ¾ã¼Y¸P¶(½ãÉ3º ¹ ³3º ¹ » ·’º ¹ »…º ¹ Í ºç¸P¶P¼Y¸m¶eµq¶ ¸ Þ ½ » ³3¸ ¹ · ÈqÞ ´Ë³3» » ³M¹ á(»C¿ ½ »†¿ º8³r·E»C¿ º‰·$¸&É3º:Þq¶…º ½ ¾(̎³M¹ ¹ º ¶ ¸ ¼ ¿ ³r·:¼…½ ´ ³rÉ9Ê-Í ¸ ´ µq¶ ³r· ³M¹ áo¸ ¼Ž¿ ³M·(̎³t¼YºÕ½ ¹ ¾ƒ´ ³M¹ ¸P¶jÍ ¿ ³MÉ3¾P¶…º ¹ Âiè º¿ ½ ·¼…½ Í º ¾»é¶ ³_½ É · ³u¹ Í º Ã€Ñ Ñ Ø Â èmº ³M·/½ ¼C³6¶+·’» ¸ ¼ ¼…º ¹ ¾ º ¶  èmº–¿ ½ ·}¹ º$Ý º ¶ ´ ³r· È ·$º ¾Ë»C¿ º ÉM³MÞ º ¶)»'Ê ¸ ¼PÞ ½ ³rÉr Ø$Ñ Â6ê ¶ ¸ ´ »C¿ ºÖ¼…½ Í » ·¦¸ ¼â»C¿ º¦Í ½ ·$º Ä ¶…º É3º ½ · ³M¹ ᑻC¿ º×½ µ µ º ÉrÉ_½ ¹ »â¸ ¹šµq¶ ¸ Þ ½ » ³3¸ ¹“³M· ¾ º ¼ ³u¹ ³_»…º É9ʲ¹ ¸ » ´E½ ¾ º®¸&È »Ë½ ·*»C¿ º®½ µ µ º ÉrÉ3½ ¹ »–Ì­½ · ¾P¶ ³9Ý ³M¹ á ½žÍ ¸ ´ ´Eº ¶…Í ³3½ É Ý º ¿ ³3Í É3º2³rÂ3º Â&»é¶ È Í ë³u¹· È Í ¿â½ˆ¶ ½ · ¿-½ ¹ ¾¹ º á Ér³3á º ¹ »/´}½ ¹ ¹ º ¶g»C¿ ½ »†½ˆ¿ È ´}½ ¹Ér³t¼Yº ¿ ½ ·,Þ º º ¹ É3¸&·’»  ٠ŠÂ6ìmº º µ ³M¹ ᐳM¹ Ý ³3º ÌÀ»C¿ º(µ º ¶ ·’¸ ¹ ½ É Í ³6¶…Í Èq´Ë·’» ½ ¹ Í º ·,¸ ¼ »C¿ º ½ µ µ º ÉrÉ3½ ¹ » ½ ¹ ¾:»C¿ º ¼…½ Í » »C¿ ½ »í½‡µq¶…º Í ³3¸ È ·2¿ È ´E½ ¹‡Ér³_¼Yº¿ ½ ·2Þ º º ¹oÉ3¸&·’»í¾&È º-»…¸‡»C¿ º‡¶ ½ · ¿ˆ½ ¹ ¾®¹ º á&Ér³ á º ¹ » ¾P¶+³tÝ ³u¹ áÕ¸ ¼`»C¿ º‰½ µ µ º ÉrÉ_½ ¹ »îƅ½ Í Í È ·$º ¾&ÄPÒ&½ ´“¸ ¼Û»C¿ º(Í ¸ ¹ · ³3¾ º ¶…º ¾2¸ µ ³M¹ ³3¸ ¹ »C¿ ½ »Û»C¿ º Page numbers of Statistics Page numbers CA No.17 of 2006 Ashok Kumar v. State ï ð ð ñ òMò_ï ó ô õŽö ÷–õ­ï ø}ùPú û9ü ûMó ýËï}ôéú+þ ÿ ï ô ôCö ñ}ô û Eñ ÷ ï ÿ ÿ û ù ñ ó ôqù ÷ ñ ø,ó ÷ ô ù ñ ø$ñ ú.ü ñ Ëþ ÿ öåò3ñ ó û3ñ ó ÿ °ï ø•ïÖð ñ ú ø$÷ ó×ùPú+ûtü ûuó ý ï û3ý ü ñ ö û ÿ ò ñ×ø þ ÿ ö°ï ø°ïOôéú+þ ÿ •ûrø ðqú ñ ø þ ñ ù2ô…÷ ó ÷ õåôCö ñÿ ÷ ó ø$ñ &þ ñ ó ÿ ñ ø:÷ íùmú+ûtü ûMó ý®ûMóÕï‡ú)ï ø öâï ó ùƒó ñ ý&òrû ý ñ ó ô }ï ó ó ñ ú Pö ñ ï ð ð ñ òrò3ï ó ô …ï ÿ ÿ þ ø$ñ ùûMø ðqú…ñ ø þ Eñ ù ô…÷ ó ÷ õ Cþ òrò 8õjñ òrò ôCö ï ô¡ûMó‰ôCö ñ ñ’ü ñ ó ô`÷ `ï óï ÿ ÿ û3ù ñ ó ôiõŽû_ôCö:ïôéú þ ÿ ôCö ñ(ü û ÿ ô û ûrø ÷ þ ó ùô…÷™ú…ñ ÿ ñ û9ü ñâø$ñ ú û3÷ þ ø ûMó Œþ&ú û3ñ ø õ ö û3ÿ ö Eï ñ …ï ô ï ò "!†ú+ûtü ûuó ý2ï# û ýÕü ñ ö û3ÿ ò3ñâòrû ’ñ‰ôCö ñ:ôéú+þ ÿ ‰ûMóÕï2ú)ï ø ö $ ï ó ù‰ó ñ ý&òrû3ý ñ ó ô Eï ó ó ñ úPö ï ø % …ï ú'&fú…ñ ï ÿ ö ûMó ýÿ ÷ ó ø$ñ( þ ñ ó ÿ ñ ø þ ð ÷ óEôCö ñ–ø’÷ ÿ û3ñ ô) ï ø ïõŽö ÷&ò3ñ +*uó ôCö ñ‰ð&ú ñ ø$ñ ó ô1ÿ ï ø$ñ (÷ ó ñ:ð&ú ñ ÿ û3÷&þ ø‰ö þ Eï óòrû Yñ‰ö ï ø, ñ ñ ó:ò ÷&ø’ôeù&þ ñ ô…÷ËôCö ñ ú ï ø öEï ó ù8ó ñ ý&òrû ý ñ ó ô ùPú û9ü ûMó ý ÷ ôCö ñ ï ð ð ñ òrò3ï ó ô -*’ï ×ó ÷ ô ûMó ÿ òrûMó ñ ù ô…÷Ëô ï.’ñ / ï™ü ñ ú °ò3ñ ó û3ñ ó ô}ü û ñ õ ï ý ï ûMó øœôö û ( •û ð ÷&ø ûMó ý0 CûMó ñ¯÷Pú ú…ñ ò ñ ï ø ûMó ýÎö û ÷ ó $ ðqú ÷ ï ô û3÷ ó . 21ãø þ ø’ô ï ó ô û9ü ñø$ñ ó ô…ñ ó ÿ ñ*ûrøú…ñ &þ û6ú…ñ ùô…÷2 ñ*û ð ÷&ø$ñ ùƒþ ð ÷ ó*ôCö ñ ï ð ð ñ òMò_ï ó ô …ï ÿ ÿ þ ø$ñ ùâø’÷âï øËô…÷-ø’ñ ô¡ï ó(ñ ï ð ò3ñ 3 . 4 Y÷PúeôCö ñ÷ ôCö ñ ú ø õ ö ÷ Ëû ý ö ô ï òrø$÷ ü ñ ó ô þ&ú…ñ,÷ óEôCö ñ ø’ï ñ % Y÷Pú5 û3ù ù ñ ó ð ï ôCö.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Gupta vs State on 4 August, 2014

8. First of all, I am of the view that the facts of both the cases cited by learned counsel for appellant are totally different from the facts of CA No. 59/12 Page 3 of 6 Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs State the case in hand as in both the cases, Court invoked the provisions of Section 340 Cr. P.C. after giving sufficient opportunities to both the parties to furnish their version on the fabricated/false documents whereas in the instant case, said stage has not even yet reached.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next